Why did our nation become

Read more...

Don't Blame Auster, He Voted For Kodos

Auster:
It was, as has been discussed before, a fundamental failure of thinking on the part of these non-Romney voting conservatives. Suppose that Obama was a Communist and would bring about Communist rule. Would these non-Romney voting conservatives still have said: “I can’t stand the Republicans, they’re meaningless, they’re useless, they’re against conservatives like me, so I won’t vote for them no matter what”?

There's no reason to think they would've. If they're weren't a lot of voters in America who would be activated to vote against the Democrat if they ran a bone fide Communist as their presidential nominee, it stands to reason the Democrats would've nominated a bone fide Communist for President.

They failed to understand that the issue wasn’t the Republicans or whether one supports the Republicans; I myself specifically said that I did not support Romney. The issue was opposing Obama and preventing his re-election.

I don't see what's the big deal here. Obama's policies in his second term aren't going to be much different than Romney's policies in his first term would've been. Plus the Obama policy Auster hates so much, the Affordable Care Act (i.e. Obamacare), is something Romney cooked up in the first place when he was governor of Massachusetts.

Did Romney have a change of heart about the government's relationship with healthcare in this country since he was governor of Massachusetts?

Truth be told he didn't even bother putting on a pretence of having such a change of heart, openly saying that he sought to "repeal and replace Obamacare" with a system that sounded almost exactly the same as Obamacare.

Romney wanted to pull the old shell game on people. It's only unfortunate that some sincere opponents of the Affordable Care Act like Lawrence Auster got suckered in.

But these conservatives were so fixated on their dislike of the Republicans that they lost sight of the bigger picture; indeed, it could even be said that as a result of their obsession with the inadequacy of Romney they lost certain basic characteristics of thinking beings: (a) the primary, intuitive ability to identify an existential threat, and (b) the logical ability to distinguish and prioritize between an existential threat and an annoyance.

Romney was more than a mere annoyance, he was a threat in himself. It's like when the police play "Good Cop/Bad Cop" on a suspect, the police officer playing the good cop is at least as much of a threat to the suspect as the bad cop.

It ain't nothing but a scam. People who voted for Romney are on par with those who think professional wrestling is real.

When these conservatives see the ruin unleashed by Obama in his second term it is going to be very difficult for them to admit that they themselves, through a fundamental failure of their own thought processes, helped this to happen.



It's interesting that for various reasons, one of them being their proportional system of representation, Greek voters seem to have a meaningful choice in their elections. Golden Dawn advocates policies far different than the policies advocated by the other parties, and yet in the last Greek election they got nearly 7% of the vote, allowing 18 of their members to enter the Greek parliament.

Read more...

Walk Down!

"...We need to continue to show that our policies help every voter out there achieve the American dream, which is to be in the middle class..." -Bobby Jindal (R)

Obviously, by the very definition of the term, all American voters will never be in the middle class. To be in the middle you need both some above and some below you. To encourage a society to aspire to an impossible state is the ultimate cruelty.

"The majority of people here—if some people have criminal records you can send 'em home—but if people are here, law-abiding, participating, four years, their kids are born here ... first secure the border, pathway to citizenship ... then it's done. But you can't let the problem continue. It's gotta stop." -Sean Hannity

Illegal immigrants, by the very definition of the term, cannot be law-abiding. More importantly, I assume the "problem" he says can't be allowed to continue is voters from Mexico and Central/South America overwhelmingly voting for the Democrats. That's where the imbecile's mind is! He only cares about what demographic change is doing to his party and not at all what it's doing to his country and his listeners. The fact that he happens to be wrong about the affect passing amnesty would have on demographic voting patterns is as nothing compared to the monstrosity of that.

"But then what to do? I think you have to ask yourself the following question. Do you accept that the GOP really is the “party of white people” and that racial divisions in the nation’s political DNA are not only real, but so permanent that minorities will forever vote for Democrats in titanic proportions? Because if you do believe that, then demographic trends should tell you that it’s time to pack up the Republican Party in its old kit bag and send it out into the sunset. President Obama didn’t even take 40% of the white vote last week and he still won. That party is over… pun intended." -Jazz Shaw (blogger at Republican blog Hotair)

Translation: "I cannot bear to believe these things, therefore they must not be true."

But all this Republican madness issues forth largely from their desire to avoid being seen as similar to Kemal Ataturk, the most evil man in history who killed so many Armenian men, women and children is his genocidal plot to wipe the Armenian people off the face of the earth.

No wonder the political descendants of Ataturk, who ruled Turkey until quite recently, were treated as pariahs by the Republican Party and the American Government, those two entities so endlessly devoted to the idea that minorities should be protected at all costs.

Read more...

"The Next America"

From VDARE:

In August, Ron Brownstein summarized the conventional view of the GOP’s demographic problem: 

'Republican strategists clearly feel the weight of trying to assemble a national majority with so little support among minorities that they must win three in five whites. “This is the last time anyone will try to do this,” one said. A GOP coalition that relies almost entirely on whites could squeeze out one more narrow victory in November. But if Republicans can’t find more effective ways to bridge the priorities of their conservative core and the diversifying Next America, that weight will grow more daunting every year.'
Obama Needs 80% of Minority Vote to Win 2012 Presidential Election, National Journal, August 27, 2012

This quoted Republican strategist is making a remarkable admission: That the immigration policies his party supports are in the process of creating something else in the place of America, a something else where they'll be no place for the views of current Republican voters to be represented by a major party. (Not that they're well represented by a major party as it is, but it's obvious the strategist is advocating the view that the Republican party should backtrack even from the things it now does to appeal to its overwhelmingly White voting base.)

It should also be noted that if the media didn't take the view that White people have votes which count for less, the first sentence of the paragraph could've been worded like this: "Democratic strategists clearly feel the weight of trying to assemble a national majority with so little support among whites that they must win four in five non-whites."

Read more...

Pop Music

Read more...

Weekend Update Circa 1996

"In Detroit under a new prison rehabilitation program called "Fresh Start", employers will get a tax break if they hire an ex-convict. Employers who hire more than one ex-convict will get robbed and killed." -Norm MacDonald

Read more...