Indentured Servitude

In 2009 dollars, the average cost for one year of tuition, fees, and room and board charges at four year American Private Colleges and Universities was $14,554 in 1975.

Guess what it is now?

$35,623!

That's right, boys and girls, it increased by 144% even after adjusting for inflation!

And the thing is that during this time the Median Income for the average American Households increased by only 21%.

This means that even after adjusting for both inflation and increased income, a year of going to a Private American University or College now costs slightly more than DOUBLE what it did in 1975.

What happened?

Ronald Reagan's Academic Supremacist regime and its rabidly Anti-Youth policies happened:

"Student loans aren't a solution to skyrocketing tuition. They're its cause.

The economy may suck, but the last thing the nation's colleges and universities need is more money. There are exceptions, but most are awash in cash.

It's easy to see why: since 1980, tuition at private institutions has gone up at triple the rate of inflation, and twice the rate of people's salaries. As Timothy Egan noted in The Times, "If the cost of milk had risen as fast as college since 1980…a gallon would be $15."

Private schools, especially the elite, are getting an enviable return on their misbegotten windfall profits. Seventy-six colleges hold endowments over $1 billion. Harvard has $35 billion--more than the GDP of 100 of the world's 179 nations.

Nationally, colleges got a 17.2 percent return on their investments in 2007--while spending a mere 4.6 percent of that tsunami of cash on their students.

Public schools are nearly as greedy. Over the last five years, they've hiked tuition 31 percent faster than inflation. According to the AP, it's "the worst record on college prices of any five-year period covered by the survey dating back 30 years."

Why do colleges raise tuition so much faster than the inflation rate? Because they can.

Since 1981, when President Reagan got rid of a financial aid system mostly based on grants (which don't have to be repaid), easy credit on student loans has made it possible for any student to borrow as much as he or she needs--or, to put it another way, however much a college decides to charge. It's simple supply and demand; with no downward pressure on tuition, the warlords of college have an overwhelming temptation to gouge.

And gouge they do.

No one seems to question the wisdom of lending tens of thousands of dollars at above-market compound interest rates to children whose employment history amounts to, at most, a year at Burger King. 17-year-old borrowers have no idea what they're getting into; parents imagine (usually wrongly) that kids' college degree will guarantee them high enough wages to pay it all off and then some.

The average college graduate comes out owing $24,200 in student loans. And that's an average. Many owe more--much more--in a non-existent job market. Saddled with crushing monthly payments as high as a home mortgage in some areas, millions of young people are forced to move back home. According to a 2002 study for the student lender Nellie Mae, student loan debt forced 38 percent of college graduates to delay buying their first house, 14 percent to get married later, and 21 percent to wait until they're older to have children.

Bankruptcy rates among young adults in their 20s are soaring, but default rates on student loans remain relatively low, under five percent. (Laws have been changed so that bankruptcy doesn't relieve your obligation to repay student loans).

Students and taxpayers get poorer. Colleges get richer."

-"No More Student Loans? Good."

Read more...

Capitalist Kapos

I still haven't been able to figure out why the Insurance Industry didn't fight Obama's Healthcare Bill.

Auster just posted a link to an interview Rush Limbaugh had with some lady in the Insurance Industry pointing out a provision in the bill that all but assures the American Insurance Industry will be wiped off the face of the Earth:

"The provision in the Senate bill requires that all insurance companies pay 85% of premiums collected every year in claims." -Stacy

Seriously? About 15% for overhead?

The average Charity has that much overhead!

"Charitable commitment shows how much of total expenses went for the charitable purpose, excluding management, overhead and fundraising. Average: 84%" -America's Most (And Least) Efficient Charities

And here's the thing, man: If a thousand poor people go up to the same charity and demand Money, the Charity can turn down however many of the requests it needs to stay solvent.

In contrast, if a thousand people go to an Insurance Company and demand Money, the Insurance Company has to pay out to every last one of them!

For this reason, Insurance Companies need to keep a lot of case on hand, far more cash on hand than Charities ever do.

In fact, this is the reason the previous requirement on Insurance Companies was to pay no more than 65% of Premiums out in Claims, so they'd have enough cash on hand not to go bankrupt every time they get a bunch of their subscribers needing payouts at the same time.

Honestly, this is very unusual.  Since World War II in the West we've had a high level of stability on the level of large institutions.

Sure, people have had their lives ruined by things imposed on them by instiutions, like the legalization of Pornography and the forced Africanization of the School System, but the institutions themselves have been fairly stable.

You haven't seen things like the overthrow of the Weimar Republic by the National Socialists lately.  You haven't seen large scale orginazations suffer the same fate that so many individuals, so many families, and so many communities have.

This is largely because large scale organizations have the upper hand in a society based on the principles of Liberalism. 

But something has changed, the Liberals are morphing into Revolutionaries, in spite of the idiocy of being a Revolutionary in the context of already controlling society.  They're now willing to risk the stability of the Liberal Governming Order just to make a more Liberal Institution, the Federal Government, get some power at the expense of the Ideologically Neutral Institution called Insurance Companies.

Ah well, overweening ambition is hardly an unheard of vice.

The real question is why the Insurance Companies haven't resisted their fate.  Perhaps, when you get down to it, we live in such a domesticated and esmasculated society that they can't believe that Obama is actually doing what he is actually doing.

The Elite of this Country has sent the sons of the commoners off to die for nothing, they've set the daughters of the commoners up to be raped and used like harlots, and all they've gotten in return are hearty handshakes of gratitude.

All they've gotten is the commoners defending to the last breath the principle that it's morally wrong to tax capital gains.

At the same time, the Elites has been able to count on the other Elites to get their backs, so long as everyone's backs are kept properly scratched.

Is it any wonder the men who live off the fat of the land thanks to Insurance Companies don't see the terrible fate that awaits them?

And I doubt this will be the end of it.  Once you've destroyed property, once you've destroyed a power base used by a significant number of influential men, you've shown yourself capable of even greater things.

"Not through speeches and majority decisions will the great questions of the day be decided - but by Iron and Blood." -Otto Von Bismark

Read more...

Solipsism As The Perfection Of Art

From The Wrath of Achilles to John Keats, a single theme has dominated Western Poetry and Art.

The thing I really like about this song is how one of the lines so perfectly and simply encapsulates this theme, in a way utterly stripped of all pretense.  

It reminds me a lot of the aesthetically brilliant last scene of the underrated film 'The Village', and what Ivy Walker says in the last shot.

Read more...

A Great Way For Parents To Save Money

The gold standard of research is a randomized study.  You get a group of subjects, and divide it into two groups chosen completely at random.

Then you do something to one of the groups, but not the other, and then look at how the group that had the thing done to it turned out compared to the control.

The brilliant thing about this technique is that you don't have to worry about confounding effects, and instead have nothing to fear but the placebo effect.

Recently something that happens all too rarely was done: A randomized study was done of something other than a medicine, something where you have much less cause to fear the placebo effect leaking in, and where the result is actually of interest to people who aren't sick.

What they looked at was Video Games:

"Parents who buy their children a video game system might want to be careful that all the fun doesn't interfere with their learning. A new study suggests owning a game system could hinder academic development, at least for young boys.

The results show that boys given a PlayStation II are slower to progress in their reading and writing skills and have more learning problems reported by their teachers than those not given a system.

The study is the first controlled trial to look at the effects of playing video games on learning in young boys. That is to say, the findings aren't based on survey data of kids' game habits, but instead on a specific group of children that were randomly assigned to receive a PlayStation or not, and followed up for a certain period of time.

Here's your PlayStation

While several studies have found an association between playing video games and poor academic performance, they don't reveal which direction the cause-effect arrow points. For instance, it could be that children who struggle academically turn to video games, because they enjoy it more than homework, Weis said.

Weis' new study involved 64 boys aged 6 to 9 who didn't currently own a video game system, but whose parents were thinking of buying one. The boys did not have previous learning or behavioral problems. The parents were told this was a study looking at child development, and they would get a video game system for participating. The scientists chose not to include girls, because they wanted to look at the effects of playing video games, and they were worried that girls might not play as much as boys would, according to Weis.

Half of the children were randomly chosen to receive the PlayStation right away, and half got it at the end of the four-month study period.

Not surprisingly, the children with the game system immediately spent more time playing video games than those in the control group, though the latter group did spend a little time playing video games, presumably at friends' houses.

Those with PlayStations also spent less time engaged in educational activities after school and showed less advancement in their reading and writing skills over time than the control group, according to tests taken by the kids. While the game-system owners didn't show significant behavioral problems, their teachers did report delays in learning academic skills, including writing and spelling.

The researchers think the learning problems result from the drop in after-school actives with educational value.

'The amount of time you have is zero sum, so if you spend your time playing video games you can't spend your time doing other things,' Weis told LiveScience.

Playing video games might displace not only traditional academic activities, such as homework and reading, but ones that, while not strictly academic, could help them in school, such as discussing what they learned that day with their parents, or having parents read to them." -LiveScience.com

Now here's the thing:

I looked it up and it looks like a Playstation 2 costs at least $60, and that doesn't even count the expense of the actual games the capitalists expect you to buy. 

But in contrast, a used baseball bat can be had for less than $13!

I think the implication of this is obvious: The next time your son asks you shell out your hard earned money for a Video Game system, get the same effect for a FRACTION of the cost by hitting him in the head with a used baseball bat instead.

Note: It is the opinion of many that damaging the brain of your child isn't a good idea, whether the damage is done by video game or used baseball bat.  For this reason one may wish to consider the advantages of simply telling your children that you won't buy them a video game system, and that they should go play outdoors if they can't think of anything to do inside the house.

Read more...

48% of Black Women Have Herpes

From NPR's Website:

NPR's "All Things Considered" on Friday examined a recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analysis showing that roughly 16% of U.S. residents ages 14 through 49 are infected with genital herpes, making it one of the nation's most common sexually transmitted infections.

The analysis shows that 48% of black women between 14 and 49 are infected with the virus, and that blacks have a 39% infection rate, compared with 12% among whites.

So a Black is 3.25 times more likely to have Herpes than a White of comparable age.

The segment featured comments from Hilda Hutcherson, a Columbia University obstetrics and gynecology professor, who suggested that an increased incidence of the virus across the years may have contributed to higher rates among blacks.

Did you catch that?  The Black community has a high rate of herpes because it has an increased incidence of herpes!  In other news, Death Valley is hot because it is hot. 

"Once the virus is within your community, it makes it much more easily transmitted and for those numbers to increase for African-American women," Hutcherson said. She added that "young women often don't protect themselves in the way that they should protect themselves."

What!? Herpes is in the other racial communities as well. The question is why it's spread so much more in the Black community.

To combat the problem, Hutcherson recommends breaking the cycle by "educating younger people," which may help "overall incidents and prevalence decrease" across time (Norris, "All Things Considered," NPR, 3/12).

So the solution to the problem of Blacks having an incredibly high rate of Herpes is to educate "Young People"?  Not Young Blacks, mind you, but Young People in general.

The CDC says that biological factors, not behavioral patterns, likely are responsible for the variations in infection rates between genders and races (Women's Health Policy Report, 3/10).

Well, of course.  Who ever heard of the idea that Blacks are more sexually irresponsible?  That couldn't possibly be it!

Also, I wonder these mysterious biological factors are also responsible for Blacks having an bastardry rate about 3 times higher than Whites.

Hmm, Blacks are about 3 times more likely to have Herpes, and also about 3 times more likely to breed bastards...

I think the same biological factors that make Blacks more prone to catch Herpes must also make them more prone to get pregnant!

Those poor Blacks, they're just as responsible and have as much self-control as Whites, but suffer far more for each sexual misdeed they commit.

At least according to the CDC.

But whatever the reason Blacks have so much Venereal Disease, this news just underscores one of the reasons Pro-Race Mixing propaganda is harmful to Non-Blacks.

Weirdly, we even seem to be reaching a point where some children of the Jewish race are being thrown into the people and culture destroying maw, with some of the Jews against it actually being attacked for 'racism':

REFLECTIONS OF A “RACIST” FATHER
By Jewamongyou

So I’ve earned the reputation of being “racist” and the enmity of those dearest to me. Why? Because I dared tell my daughter that I disapprove of her dating black men.
...

Why Not Black?

I do not want my descendants to be black. Why not, you ask? Here are some reasons and it should be noted that most of the following traits apply to black men, to one degree or another, regardless of where they are found or where they hail from:

1) A pathological culture that does not value learning, reading, or the other finer things in life that are considered “acting white”. Please note, I am speaking of American blacks and this cultural phenomenon is well known. Many have bemoaned this fact and it is no secret. Even though individual blacks can transcend this cultural handicap, there is a much higher risk for their children and grandchildren than for members of other ethnicities. The pressure, upon young blacks, is enormous. I do not want this to be the lot of my grandchildren.

2) Higher risk for many diseases. Hardly a day goes by when we don’t read about some malady that blacks are at higher risk for. In fact, it is rare to see an article about health that does not point this out. I do not want my descendants to be at higher risk for those diseases. We’ve got enough as it is.

3) A much higher risk for STD’s: I do not want my grandchildren to belong to a society that suffers disproportionately from sexually transmitted disease. Who, in his right mind, would want that for his own people? Given the choice, I’d rather my descendants be white and not have to deal with it.

4) A considerably lower average I.Q. The average I.Q. for white Americans is 100. For black Americans, it is 85. This is not based on one or two isolated studies; it is a well-established fact about which there is no dispute. The dispute has centered on the causes of this disparity. Whatever they may be, I do not want my descendants to be part of a society that is so handicapped. There are all kinds of negative consequences to societies whose average I.Q. is that low. Again, individuals may transcend those consequences, but their children will always be impacted by them. Ideally, each individual should be part of a greater society. Something larger than himself. As it stands, most blacks in America belong to black society. Many of them want it this way. Others perhaps not. Either way, black society is saddled with this major handicap. Given the choice, I’d rather my progeny not be handicapped in this way.

This is a good place to introduce the concept of “regression to the mean”. It turns out that, within various populations, the children of the highly intelligent will likely regress DOWN toward the mean of the population. Likewise the children of the less intelligent will regress UP toward the mean. So, even if my daughter picks out a bright black man, their children will probably be less intelligent than either of them. In other words, the norm, for black Americans, is 85 and there will be a tendency for black children to regress toward that, even if their parents are highly intelligent. Of course, a good upbringing will mitigate this effect to a certain degree – but for how many generations?

5) Much higher risk for illegitimacy. It seems that black men are much less likely to marry their sweethearts than white men. Why would I want my descendants to be part of such a society? Even black mother will sometimes warn their daughters about black men.

6) Higher risk for being a criminal and for being the victim of a criminal. I don’t think this needs elaboration, obvious as it is. A black man is about eight times more likely to be a murderer than a white man. He is also much more likely, contrary to popular myth, to be a serial killer or a rapist.

Higher Risk of STD’s

The high incidence of STD’s, among blacks, means that it is those who have sexual relations with them are in much greater danger than those who have sexual relations with white men.
Now let’s take a look at infection rates, among blacks vs. whites, for STD’s:

Regarding AIDS, blacks make up about half of known HIV infections in the U.S. – even though they make up only about 12% of the population. About 2% of American blacks are HIV positive. In other words, a black man is about 7.5 times more likely to be HIV positive than a white man.

For Gonorrhea, blacks are 18 times more likely to be infected.

For Syphilis, blacks are 6 times more likely to be infected.

For Chlamydia, blacks are 8 times more likely to be infected.

All told, it is about 25 times more risky to have sex with a black man as it is to have sex with a white man.

Would I encourage my daughter to drive without a seatbelt? Seatbelts reduce the risk of highway fatalities by about 50%. In contrast, refraining from sex with blacks will reduce the risk of STD’s (admittedly not always fatal) by 92%. Any father who remains silent in the face of such risk must either hate his own children or be woefully ignorant.

Higher Risk of Domestic Violence

Across all categories (yes, even serial murder) of crime, blacks are far more likely to be perpetrators. Domestic violence is no different. Because of a combination of “no snitch” culture among blacks and political correctness among whites, there is a lack of willingness to talk about domestic violence among blacks. But it appears that domestic violence is about twice as high, among blacks, than among whites:

“White couples reported rates of male-to-female and female-to-male partner violence at eight and 10 percent, respectively. In contrast, black couples reported rates of 20 percent and 22 percent, respectively.

...

Diversity

I once posed a question to a leftist online forum: would the world be less diverse if there were no Jews? I then followed up with the simple observation that, left unchecked intermarriage would destroy the Jewish People. That being the case, wouldn’t it be better for the cause of diversity if Jews married other Jews and had children?

The above question/statement was viewed with outrage. It was met with accusations of bigotry and intolerance. But where are the Sumerians now? Where are the Goths? Where are the Hittites? All those peoples intermarried themselves into oblivion. I don’t know if the world is worse off without them, but I do know that we have less diversity. How anybody can reasonably claim that wanton intermarriage cannot destroy a numerically small people is beyond me. Furthermore, what meaning does ethnic diversity have if ethnic groups do not preserve their distinctiveness? Perhaps those who tout the virtues of diversity are actually enemies of diversity and they only use it as a tool to destroy ethnic distinctions and, they hope, war and strife. I suspect this really is the case. If so, then let them come out and say, “we are against diversity”. In the end, we cannot know what the hostile elite truly want – but we can know what WE want. As for me, I want diversity. I want to preserve our ethnic distinctiveness so that we Jews can continue to contribute our part in the patchwork of Mankind. I would consider this a worthy goal and a duty to pass on to my children.

...

Read more...

The Ministry of Health

 

"Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship." -O'Brien to Winston Smith, 1984

 

"The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture, and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation." -1984

Read more...

A Story For Children

A man and his wife owned a very special goose. Every day the goose would lay a golden egg, which made the couple very rich.

"Just think," said the man's wife, "If we could have all the golden eggs that are inside the goose, we could be richer much faster."

"You're right," said her husband, "We wouldn't have to wait for the goose to lay her egg every day."

So, the couple killed the goose and cut her open, only to find that she was just like every other goose. She had no golden eggs inside of her at all, and they had no more golden eggs.

Read more...

When Was the Last Time an American Industry Sat Idly By As Its Own Doom Was Sealed?

I may be getting this wrong, but it appears that under Obamacare you'll have three choices:

1. Pay for your own Insurance.

2. Be employed by someone who'll pay for your Insurance.

3. Pay the Government a $1,900 Fee, and then have the Government pay for your Healthcare.

But here's the thing: under Obamacare there will be severe limits on how much price premium Insurance Companies can give young people, healthy people, people without preexisting conditions, etc.

Thus the vast majority of people who don't get Insurance from their employers will be stuck paying way more than $1,900 a year for Health Insurance.

Therefore they'll just stop paying for Insurance, and pay the fee instead.

Probably enough individual insurance costumers will do this to cause every Insurance Company in the Country to go bankrupt.

It's very important to understand that individual costumers are far more profitable to Insurance Companies than people who get covered by their employers, and once they've been pulled out of the Semi-Free Market by the lure of Obamacare, Private Insurance Companies will have no real incentive to stay in business.

Then the Federal Government will step in, to solve the problem it created in the first place.

The Moral: Invest Ye Not in Insurance Stocks.

Read more...

The Straight of Hormuz

"O Clashing Rocks, under whose shadow the dark
Threat waits, though through this cleft
Io fled safe, Pursued by the sharp stinging of the gadfly,
Fled Beyond Europe's Land
And Europe's sea, fled safe but sick at heart,
Away from home and kin,
Into the alien wilderness of Asia.

What sort of men would leave the holy streams
Of Dirce, or the reeds
Green-growing in Eurotas, to explore
A bitter beach, to dare these ominous rocks
Where the seas meet in fog
While Jerusalem, among Her colonnades
Demanding sacrifice,
Receives upon her altar human blood?

Why have they urged the oarsmen of their ship
To shake the clinging sea
With a great stroke and to accelerate
With rush of rivalry the racing wind?

Was it to sweep the shores
For riches and to vie in bearing home,
Each to upbuild his house,
The treasures and trophies of the World?

That glittering hope is immemorial
And beckons many men
To their undoing. Ever insatiate
They sail the sea and look to foreign towns
To fill their ships with spoil.

But some men never find prosperity,
For all their voyaging,
While others find it with no voyaging."

-Euripides, Iphigenia in Tauris
______________________________________

Golden Dawn's website is found here:
http://www.xryshaygh.com/index.php/home

Information on how to donate to Golden Dawn can be found here:
http://www.xryshaygh.com/index.php/home/oikonomikh-enisxysh

Golden Dawn NYC's website is found here:
http://xaameriki.wordpress.com/

Read more...

"And They Make Everything Easier For Us"

Read more...

"Why Can't Our Indian Actors Dance With Locals?"

It seems that even though no significant number of British people are opposed to the race and culture destroying idiocy of White British Girls appearing in Bollywood Films, at least some very powerful Indians are opposed.

Imagine that!  Powerful men in a Country are actually standing up for their Racial Sisters, actually trying to protect them the harm that comes when Indian Men are brainwashing into only finding Non-Indian Women sexually attractive, and actually trying to preserve their ancient bloodline by granting Indian Women a monopoly on Indian Men.

This is exactly the kind of solidarity between the sexes that is needed if a race is to survive.

White British actresses told to leave Bollywood

British actresses who appear in Bollywood films are being targeted in a hate campaign by one of India's most feared political leaders.

Stars including Alice Patten, the daughter of Lord Patten of Barnes, and Hazel Crowney, a former model from Kent, have been accused of stealing jobs from local girls.

Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), a Mumbai nationalist street gang and political party which inspires terror throughout the city, has called on foreign white actresses to go home.

UK actresses flock to Bollywood His campaign for a ban on the estimated 1,000 British and other foreign actors who regularly appear in Bollywood films has been widely criticised but many foreign actors are too afraid to speak out.

Thackeray is especially feared in Bollywood, where he has the power to shut productions and close cinemas.

The campaign for a ban comes as increasing numbers of European and South American actresses are finding roles in Bollywood movies.

In the last few years, Kylie Minogue and Denise Richards have appeared in major Indian films. Miss Patten starred in Rang De Basanti, one of the most popular Bollywood films of recent years, while Minogue appeared in a raunchy song and dance scene called Chiggy Wiggy in the film Blue with action hero Akshay Kumar.

It has also become increasingly common for Hollywood stars like Sylvester Stallone and Superman star Brandon Routh to take cameo roles in Bollywood productions to boost their appeal.

This international approach could now be threatened because producers and directors fear Raj Thackeray will ruin their films if they do not comply.

The campaign to ban foreign actors was launched last week after the MNS raided a the set of Crooked, starring Amitabh Bachchan, India's most famous star, and demanded to see the work permits of 136 foreign actors and actresses.

The MNS holds seats in the Mumbai region but its strength comes from its activists who are regarded by many as violent street thugs. Its supporters have launched violent attacks on rickshaw drivers from other parts of India and threatened organisations which retain the name 'Bombay' instead of 'Mumbai.'

Shalini Thackeray, an MNS leader, said: "Why can't our Indian actors dance with locals? We will insist that only local junior artists should be employed.

"We will check whether they have valid permits. Many times, foreigners come here on tourist visas, but take up work in Bollywood."

She was supported by one of Bollywood's top dancers, Rakhi Sawant, who said: "Because of these foreigners, our Indian girls remain jobless. These white girls are like lollipops that only last for two days."

Vir Singhvi, one of India's leading commentators, said the party was using the issue to win over Mumbai's women voters who have so far shunned the MNS.

"The MNS says [these dance scenes] are against Indian traditions, vulgar and cheap. They do this to get women's votes because women object to half-naked dancers."

As they damn well should, I might add.

Read more...

Yes He Can?

Read more...

The ACTUAL Source of European Fertility, At Least For Now

There’s an idea kicking around that the variation in fertility from one European Country to the next is caused by some European Countries having more Muslims.

So that, for example, we would have to conclude that France has a relatively high Fertility Rate of 1.98 Children per Woman not because White French Ladies are vastly outbreeding White German Women and their anemic Fertility Rate of 1.41, but rather because the French rate is unnaturally inflated by the larger number of Muslims in France.

But here’s the problem with this idea: According to the CIA World Factbook, Muslims only make up 5% to 10% of the French population.

How on Earth could Muslims be outbreeding Whites to such an extent that, at less than 10% of the French population, they are pushing French Fertility .57 extra Babies per Woman higher than the neighboring Country of Germany?

Recently the Blogger Al Fin tried to back up the extraordinary claim that Muslims explain the higher Fertility found in France by writing:

"Here’s the order of healthiest fertility rates for Western European countries:
1) France
2) Netherlands
3) Belgium
4) Switzerland
5) Austria
6) Germany
7) Italy
8) Spain

And here’s the order with the highest proportion of Muslims:
1) France
2) Netherlands
3) Belgium
4) Switzerland
5) Austria
6) Germany
7) Italy
8) Spain

In 50 years, Europe is going to be filled with two demographic groups: elderly Europeans and Muslims." -The Source of European Fertility, Now and Then

But there are two main problems with what Al Finn wrote:

1. Al Fin's list of Western European Countries by Fertility Rate is made up.

2. Al Fin's list of Western European Countries by Percentage Muslim is made up.

For example, the Reason Commenter Al Fin used as his source claims that the Netherlands has the 2nd highest Fertility Rate in Western Europe, even though Ireland is in Western Europe and has a 1.85 Total Fertility Rate compared to The Netherlands' TFR of only 1.66.

And then your have Portugal not even on the list, even though it’s a Western European Country that has a Fertility Rate higher than Germany, Austria, Italy, and Spain!

With the list of Countries by percentage Muslim, with just a quick glance I noticed the strange decision to list Belgium ahead of Austria, when even the Wikipedia Article Al Fin links to later in his post lists Austria as being 4.2% Muslim and Belgium only 3% Muslim!

Clearly these lists have been doctored by someone with an agenda, that’s clear from how every mistake just happened to be in the direction of strengthening the correlation between Percent Muslim and Fertility, and Al Fin gullibly fell for the scam due to existing in a mind weakening malaise of excessive pessimism.

Anyways, I decided to look at the 8 Western European Countries where Wikipedia provides their respective proportion Muslim, and look at the correlation between said proportion and their respective Fertility Rates:

Germany    5        1.41
Austria      4.2      1.39
Lux           3          1.78
Belgium     3         1.65
Iceland     0.1       1.9
Ireland     0.5       1.85
Portugal   0.1       1.49
Italy         0          1.31

Correlation Between % Muslim and TFR = -.293

P Value = .4826

So clearly, given the NEGATIVE and statistically insignicant correlation between % Muslim and Fertility, there’s no indication to be found supporting the assertion that Muslims are driving European Fertility Rates at this time.

Now if Immigration continues apace, and if the fertility differential between Muslims and Whites continues for long enough, with nothing being done by the White Majority to change the demographic course of History, this will change at some point.

However, to say as Al Fin does that Muslims are the “Source of European Fertility” is just defeatist nonsense that isn’t supported by a shred of evidence.

Notably, the findings I report here provide strong support for the proposition that the ACTUAL reason for France’s high fertility compared to other Countries in Western Europe is the Generous Subsidies and Advantages they give to Mothers.

As Europe Grows Grayer, France Devises a Baby Boom
By Molly Moore
October 18, 2006

JUMEAUVILLE, France -- When the municipal day-care center ran out of space because of a local baby boom, the town government gave Maylis Staub and her husband $200 a month to defray the cost of a "maternal assistant" to care for their two children.

When Staub delivered twins last December -- her third and fourth children -- the nation not only increased their tax deductions and child allowances, the government-owned French train system offered 40 percent discounts off tickets for the parents and the children until they reach their 18th birthdays.

"The government favors families a lot," said Staub, 35, a project manager for a French cellphone company. "They understand that families are the future. It's great for us."

While falling birthrates threaten to undermine economies and social stability across much of an aging Europe, French fertility rates are increasing. France now has the second-highest fertility rate in Europe -- 1.94 children born per woman, exceeded slightly by Ireland's rate of 1.99. The U.S. fertility rate is 2.01 children.

In many European countries, park benches are filled with elderly residents. In France, parks overflow with boisterous children, making it an international model for countries struggling with the threat of zero population growth. In recent months, officials from Japan, Thailand and neighboring Germany have traveled to France to study its reproductive secrets.

But the propensity of women here to have more babies has little to do with notions of French romance or the population's formerly strong religious ties to the Roman Catholic Church.

France heavily subsidizes children and families from pregnancy to young adulthood with liberal maternity leaves and part-time work laws for women. The government also covers some child-care costs of toddlers up to 3 years old and offers free child-care centers from age 3 to kindergarten, in addition to tax breaks and discounts on transportation, cultural events and shopping.

Read more...

Ancestor Derived Climate Preference

"Blonde and red hair are favorable mutations for women because they make men notice them more. Fair hair reflects more light than dark hair, so it catches the eye more.

In The Descent of Man, Charles Darwin called this kind of mechanism that makes a person more attractive to the opposite sex 'sexual selection.' He argued that it was the main engine of the human race's striking racial diversity.

Still, sexual selection can't fight too strongly against natural selection. You can't be a ladies’ man if you are dead. And that may explain why blonde or red hair never became universal anywhere. First, it would lose some of its scarcity value if all women had it. But, also, while it's good for your daughters, under pre-modern conditions it was bad for your sons. It tended to hurt males at hunting and war.

The problem is that you can see blondes from farther away—at a golf tournament, I once recognized the ultra-blonde champion Greg Norman from 500 yards off just from the sun glinting off his near-platinum hair.

It didn't hurt Norman's golf career that his hair catches the eye from more than a quarter mile away. But for one of his Norman ancestors on a hunt or a raid on a sunny day, it could have ruined the element of surprise. Of course, in the Nordic homelands of the Normans, there weren't many bright sunny days.

Thus, blonde hair becomes more common the farther in Europe you go north, where the sun is low in the sky - Europe is at a much higher latitude than any other heavily populated region - and the land heavily forested and shady. Within Northern Europe, red hair becomes more prevalent the farther west you go, where, due to the Gulf Stream, the weather is extremely cloudy and misty. So, in Northwest Europe, you can have lots of blondes and redheads because lack of strong sunlight meant that shiny hair worked well for women, without much penalizing their men folk when hunting or raiding."
-Steve Sailer

Read more...

How Should We Solve the Problem of So Many White Women Dying Alone and Childless?

I recently wrote a Blog Post lamenting the dysgenic tragedy that was the US Government's repression of Polygamy is Utah.

Ronduck replied skeptically:

Unless you have a hidden store of women you are willing to open to increase the gender ratio above 50:50 then I would have to oppose polygamy. The polygamous Mormon splinter group (FLDS) that left AZ for TX had to expel its excess men in order to ensure that each man could have three wives. What do you plan to do, import every excess woman in Russia?

Polygynous Evolutionist then addressed Ronduck's question:

What do you plan to do, import every excess woman in Russia?

Now that you mention it...

You know that a lot of Russian women are ending up as prostitutes in white slavery rings far away from their homeland, right? Maybe it would better if they end up wives.

I hear the young FLDS men are looking.

I don't care about maintaining the current social order. I'd just as soon see women and men be able to choose what kind of relationship they want. Freedom and evolution can be uncomfortable but the idea is that the final results are worth it.

White people have done polygamy brilliantly, as if it were God's Will itself.

Statsaholic Responds:

I am in agreement with Polygynous Evolutionist’s excellent suggestion.

White Advocates need to do far more to disrupt International White Slavery rings, and to free the Eastern European Women held by brutal pimps in the worst kind of bondage.

Once these Eastern European Women are saved, the question becomes what to do with them.

We could send them back to Eastern Europe, but there’s a serious problem with this idea.

It is clear that there’s a shortage of Men interested in marriage in Russia, the Ukraine, and Countries like that.

Therefore if we sent them back to their Homeland, most of them would still face the terrible economic and reproductive dilemma that drove them to desire leaving their Country in the first place, the very desire the Sex Slavers took advantage of by offering to help them emigrate.

The ideal would be to settle them in such a way that they can reproductively take advantage of a community of High Quality Whites who have an excess of Eligible Men.

The FLDS is the best example of such a community I know of.

Because of Polygamy, they don’t suffer from the Fertility Killing problem of a shortage of Eligible Men.

And because they take Polygamy so far, much further than any other group in the World today, they actually have that rarest of things: An excess of Eligible Men.

Just as importantly, these excess Men are going to be High in Quality, due to the fact that there are strong indications the FLDS has an average IQ at least two thirds of a standard deviation above the White Norm.

Therefore even though FLDS Male Culls will be less intelligent and high in genetic quality than the average FLDS Man, they’ll still be at least up to the White Russian par.

For this reason, if a group of Russian Women married some of the excess Men produced by the FLDS community, they wouldn’t be marrying down, and the offspring produced would not in any way represent degeneration relative to their mothers.

For this reason a Russian and/or Eastern European Woman saved from prostitution should be offered the hand of an FLDS Man in marriage, along with the Green Card that would go along with that hand.

To adress Ronduck's main contention that removing the irrational legal and social sanctions on Polygamy will lead us to a situation with a lot of excess men, there are two reasons to reject this idea:
 
1. There is no chance that America will practice Polygamy to the extent that the FLDS does, as the FLDS is a society not just based on the tolerance of Polygamy, but rather upon its being the only accepted form of marriage.
 
2. American currently suffers a SHORTAGE of Eligible Men, due to the fact that so many men aren't interested in marriage and would rather do things like play video games, listen to rap music, and watch pornography.
 
Therefore the Polygamist Men who'd arise after the reversal of the Pro-Monogamy bias of our institutions would serve the noble purpose of sopping up the Women who are currently having their reproductive potential wasted due to the lack of Men they want to marry who are willing to actually go through with it.
 
There are so many White American Women who go without marriage, and die without companion or issue, and when you consider that the resistance to marriage is far more likely to come from Men as opposed to Women, it is very clear where the problem lies.
 
Some might object that there are reasons why so many White Men these days aren't interested in marriage, some of them relating to the Anti-Male Bias of Divorce Law. 
 
But this is completely irrelevant.
 
The important thing isn't WHY we have a shortage of White Men interested in marrying White Women. 

The real issue here is that whatever its cause, this Horrific, Dysgenic, and Fertility Killing Problem would be solved by Polygamy.

Read more...

Opportunity Cost

Some of the Mormon girls at this Barbering and Cosmotology School are absolute Poetry in motion, and this helps demonstrate what a tragedy it was when the evil that is the Republican Party forced Utah to give up the fertility enhancing institution that is Polygamy.

While there are a pretty good number of Mormons now, can you just imagine how many more Mormons there'd be if for all these years and generations they had Polygamy!

We lost MILLIONS of girls like the ones at the beginning of this video, just so some filthy politicians could with no good reason expand the domain of their unjustly won power.

Read more...

Yet Another Triumph for Liberalism, But Have We Gone Too Far?

I really think we took vengeance too far by responding to the 9/11 by inflicting Democracy on the Machofacist Islamohitlers in Iraq.

It was just too cruel, given that making a Country a Democracy automatically empowers the Liberal and Freedom Loving majority of a society, Men and especially Women who have what former President George W. Bush called the God given desire for the liberty to run into the rapist infested woods late at night alone, show millions of strange men their vaginas, and to get gang raped at an unchaperoned School Dance.

Now some would say that the reason we have that sort of thing in America is because we fail to do enough to fight Jewish Influence on our Culture and Politics.

Clearly though this is an Anti-Semitic Canard, when you consider that the Anti-Jewish Country of Iraq turned into a land most inhospitable for the Socially Conservative as soon as we made it a Democracy!

BAGHDAD – "Anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, in a surprise news conference on the eve of the Iraqi election, has urged his followers to turn out and vote. The Shiite leader spoke from the capital of neighboring Iran, and the press conference was broadcast on al-Alam television, Iranian state TV's Arabic-language station." -Associated Press

What a fool!

Clearly a highly religious and socially conservative Machofacist like Al-Sadr has no chance of his party doing well in Democratic Elections!

Democracy = Good
Good = Liberal

Therefore:
Democracy = Liberal

This equation must be right, given that well more than 3,000 American Fighting Men, and 650,000 Iraqi Civilians, died based purely on the calculus that it was correct.

Read more...

The Rejection of Historical Memory

"Thoughts frightened of the light,
Frightened of each other.
They to a clock ticking.
Like a flock of sheep led to slaughter,
The seconds keep a good pace,
Stick together, don't look back,
All worried, as they go,
What the shepherd may be thinking."
-Charles Simic

But who is the shepherd?
__________________________________

Golden Dawn's website is found here:
http://www.xryshaygh.com/index.php/home

Information on how to donate to Golden Dawn can be found here:
http://www.xryshaygh.com/index.php/home/oikonomikh-enisxysh

Golden Dawn NYC's website is found here:
http://xaameriki.wordpress.com/

Read more...

But Father, How is This Recession Different Than Any Other?

How are Feminism and Race Replacement Immigration Working Out, My Dear Descendants?

Employment-to-Population Ratio: Men (25-54 Years)

The general trend is VERY clear, ever since 1974 there's been a profound and nearly relentless decline in the Employment Rate for American Males, with this downward motion only being masked to some extent by the boom and bust cycle.

In 2008 was when things really started getting interesting, though, as all parts of the economy actually concerned with producing value started to evaporate much faster than before.

After all, the Corporate Titans have to meet their quotas of Blacks, Hispanics, and Women! So how could they keep on the workers who actually produce value, when those workers are overwhelmingly White Men?

Read more...

"I'm Awesome!"

This video is notable partly because it features appearances by every member of the famous Country Trio The Confederattes.

Read more...

At Least There's One Briton Who Isn't Yet a Slave

Remarkably, there are only two Political Parties in all of England who love England enough to not be fully in accord with its complete dissolution as a political and cultural entity by the satanic usurpers in Brussels: The British National Party and the United Kingdom Independance Party.

And though the English people, if they even deserve to still be called that at this point, are allowed the perfect freedom to vote for either of these Patriotic Parties, there hasn't yet been an election where their combined vote total entered the double digits.

Truly, there are none so imprisoned as those who refuse to walk through their cage's open door.

If the Gods would not destroy us, this man would the favorites to be the next Prime Minister of Britain:



Note: Golden Dawn is a political party in Greece, its platform calls for the forthright rejection of Greece's subjugation by EU memorandum.

Golden Dawn's website is found here:
http://www.xryshaygh.com/index.php/home

Information on how to donate to Golden Dawn can be found here:
http://www.xryshaygh.com/index.php/home/oikonomikh-enisxysh

Golden Dawn New York's website is found here:
http://xaameriki.wordpress.com/

Read more...

Post-Millennium Tension (Folk vs. Pop)

Interestingly, the White Birth Rate in New Jersey is high for a State that voted Democrat in 2004, with only Michigan being higher.

So perhaps there's something to be said for Bravado and Vitalism, at least in comparison to the bloodless self-effacement shown by Vermonters and all those dying people descended from the Race Traitor Abolitionists who ruined everything for this Country.

Unfortunately, Abortion Rates by State have never been broken down by Race, so there's no way to know if the relatively high Abortion Rate in New Jersey is driven by the Whites having a higher rate than most Whites, or the minorities having a higher rate than most minorities.

The extreme proximity of New Jersey to the Nerve Center of the American Abortion Industry, New York City, could be pushing up the abortion rate of all groups in Jersey via the mechanism of making Abortion more available.

Still, if the Whites in New Jersey are actually having a lot of abortion, it means they must be having an incredible amount of sex to have a birthrate so close to the replacement rate.

Impressively, the White Fertility Rate in New Jersey is just .01 less than that in the solid Red State of Alabama, in spite of Alabama having an Abortion Rate half that of New Jersey!

It looks like Guidos and Guidettes are here to stay.

Yet more proof that it pays to be proud of your Ethno-Racial Group.

Read more...

Delayed Marriage Patterns Have Caused Hundreds of Thousands of American Women to be Raped

I've written an article for The Occidental Observer Blog called:

"More Marriage, Less Rape"

The key finding I report in this article is that FBI Data shows Single American Women are more than 9 Times More Likely to be Raped than Married Women are.

Now you might think this is because Single Women are younger and young Women are more likely to be raped.

But this can't be the explanation because:

1. Divorced Woman are older than Single Woman, and yet have an even more elevated risk of being raped than Single Women do.

2. There is a POWERFUL +.602 Correaltion between the age at first marriage for a year from 1960 to 2007 and that year's Rape Rate.

This means that as more American Women have delayed marriage, more American Woman have suffered the horror of being raped.

This is clearly due to the fact that not being married is a profound risk factor for being raped, and that the more of a female's sexual peak she spends in a single state, the more likely she is to be raped.

The practical implications of these findings should be obvious.

Read more...