My last post got this interesting response, which I follow with my answer to the reader's point:
"This is because Evolution programmed Women to want to have sex with a Man who is attractive to Women in general." -Statsaholic
Or maybe women are programmed to also compete for the best male genetic material for their next generation. So, they reach as high as they can on the dating/mate quality food chain - it's the "Brand Name" phenomenon.
For instance, I've never known much about cameras, but if I go to Best Buy and select one there's a certain safety and status in choosing one of the brands that more experienced photographers are choosing. -Camlost
The problem with your theory is that it only makes sense to follow someone else's lead if they are more discerning than you are.
But, in sharp contrast, there's no evidence that the influence other Women have on the Average Broad is dependant on said Broad having reason to think other Women more discerning judges of Male genetic quality than she is.
For a Woman of average perceptiveness, purely following her own inclination is just as good as following the crowd from the standpoint of maximizing the genetic quality of the man who inseminates her.
Where following the crowd makes sense is from the standpoint of maximizing the sexual attractiveness of male offspring.
Let's say that for no good reason 99% of Women in a particular time and place get wet at the sight of a Roman Nose, while being disgusted by any other type of nose.
How should the 1% of Woman who don't find a Roman Nose attractive behave?
Well, if they just follow their own inclination and sex up men without Roman Noses, guess what will happen!
Their sons will likely inherit Non-Roman Noses, and have an incredibly hard time reproducing.
This will gravely reduce the genetic fitness of an eccentric Woman who allowed herself to be impregnated with the seed of a Man who possessed a trait most Women find highly unattractive.
Therefore it would make more sense even for a Woman who disliked Roman Noses to follow the Female Crowd, and to prefer Men with Roman Noses.
Sunday, February 28, 2010
My last post got this interesting response, which I follow with my answer to the reader's point:
Saturday, February 27, 2010
There's nothing Women find less attractive than a Man who fails to hide his sexual frustration.
This is because Evolution programmed Women to want to have sex with a Man who is attractive to Women in general.
That way the Sons she produces will be attractive to Women in general.
This is important not because most Woman have creepily incestuous relationships with their sons where they get off from watching them make out with lots of different women, but rather because it will give them way more biological grandchildren.
More Biological Grandchildren = You've Won the Game of Evolution, Girlfriend!
Therefore if you come across like you need a woman, you aren't going to get one in a million years.
Plus, it hurts the Ego of a Woman to notice that the Man trying to score with her comes across like someone who is disturbingly close to resorting to bestiality.
"Hey baby, you sure look better than nothing tonight."
Friday, February 26, 2010
Las Vegas is a cesspool of Whoring, Drug Use, and Disgustingly Cowardly Men who are too gutless to cheat on their wives unless they're hundreds of miles away.
Given these facts, which could hardly be denied even by the Whorepit's Slimy Mob Lawyer of a Jewish Mayor, we are forced in the interest of security to ask: "How could a pious Muslim offended at this paragon of Judeo-American wickedness inflict maximal harm unto it?"
Well, how are the suckers and wannabe date rapists carted into Las Vegas?
And what powers Airplanes?
And how could a person or small group of persons greatly increase the price of oil?
Well, it seems all it took to create a near shutdown of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, which carries more than 15% of America's domestic oil production, was a single bullet hole:
Trans-Alaska Pipeline Shot By A Drunk
ANCHORAGE, AK – October 4, 2001 4:55 PM – "The trans-Alaska pipeline was shut down at about 2:30 p.m. today after an Alyeska surveillance helicopter detected oil on the ground in the vicinity of milepost 400, about 15 miles north of pump station 7. The surveillance crew detected what appears to be a bullet hole in the pipe. Alyeska’s Operations Control Center immediately began the process of shutting down the north end of the line, above the site of the incident. Alyeska asked North Slope producers to reduce production to 50 percent. Alyeska response crews are on their way to the scene to attempt to stop the leak and clean up the oil. So far, there is no estimate of how much oil has leaked. Alaska State Troopers have been dispatched to the scene. All appropriate government agencies have been notified." -Slocomhouse
When you consider how much damage a drunk with a single bullet managed to accidentally inflict on the Trans-Alaskan Pipeline, it seems to me that a profound amount of damage could be done to the US Oil Supply by a small group of Muslims wiring timed explosives at appropriate intervals across the structure.
Another thing we need to watch for is that the doubtlessly heavily armed Muslims will likely be clever enough to lie in wait near the last point they rig with explosives, prepared to send the first responders to what they consider the proper abode of the Infidel (Hell).
Also, even blowing a single hole in the Pipeline could cut off the oil flow for a good amount of time if the simple expedient of seeding a Perimeter around the blast site with Land Mines was indulged.
Though there's no good reason for our dastardly Muslim enemies to limit themselves to one hole, when dozens of holes could quite easily be inflicted on the structure.
What they could do is seed just a few of the holes with Land Mines, which would likely be enough to deter the cowardly Americans from moving in to fix ANY of the holes.
You might think that the Land Mines could be cleared quickly, but think again:
"Most land mines are fairly small devices shaped as cylinders, rectangles, or discs. They are either buried at a shallow depth, or left in debris and overgrowth. Owing to their simplicity, size, and low cost, millions have been deployed around the world.
Mines are 'area-denial' weapons, designed to prohibit access to a specific territory or route. In conflict, this can encompass almost any area critical to the military strategy of the moment, including civilian areas. For example, a supply route might be mined to cut off or hamper supply chains. At the end of the conflict, the same route could be a critical transportation route for civilians, and could still be littered with unknown mines.
The removal of mines is an expensive, dangerous, and complicated process. The mines are highly volatile, and can still explode decades after their placement. In war, the process of mine laying is focused on making them impossible to detect―and post-conflict, they remain just as hard to detect.
In World War Two the metal detector was adapted to detect mines, which have metal parts like firing pins and shrapnel. Producers quickly responded by making as much as possible in a mine with plastic or wood to avoid detection.
In another mine removal process, a mechanical minesweeper (an armored truck) uses weight to set off mines. In response, mines have been created with extremely sensitive firing pins that resist heavy weights but can be set off by a human footstep." -WSWS
Can you imagine how much impact an attack like this would have on the Stock Market if it was undertaken right as America and/or Israel attacked Iran?
Investors would be worried enough about the safety of the Oil Supply as it was, because of the Straights of Hormuz being in play.
Just think, just think, just think how their blood would run cold as they'd be forced to watch the utter vulnerability of the American Oil Distribution System openly exposed for all to see!
But even if it turns out the Streets turn red with rivers of blood, even if their own blood is spilled by mobs howling outrage at the incomprehensible hell they've lead us into, our Elites will never admit that the attacks happened not because Law Enforcement failed to secure an inherently unsecurable structure, but rather because of the Government's strange combination of a Pro-Muslim Immigration Policy and an Anti-Muslim Foreign Policy.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Heavens to Betsy, Mabel! It looks like our War to Make Iraq Safe for Commentary Magazine and Hardcore Pornography has hit a snag.
Ah well, I guess we inflicted the equivalent of 220 World Trade Center Attacks on Iraq for nothing.
Anti-American bloc gains ground ahead of Iraq vote
BAGHDAD – The political movement of Iraq's best-known anti-American cleric has emerged as a major contender in next month's national elections, raising the possibility that the next prime minister could be openly hostile to the U.S. and friendly toward Iran.
A prime minister loyal to Muqtada al-Sadr might push the U.S. military to speed up its withdrawal timetable and pose a threat to future military and economic cooperation between the United States and Iraq.
Such a choice also could undermine efforts to reconcile Iraq's religious groups, with memories still fresh of brutal sectarian warfare between al-Sadr's Shiite militiamen and Sunni extremists.
The United States looks to the March 7 election as a key step to cement Iraq's infant democracy.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's alliance, backed by the powers of incumbency, has been widely viewed as the bloc that would emerge with the largest number of seats.
But al-Maliki's standing has been hurt by a series of horrific bombings in central Baghdad that exposed the inadequacies of Iraq's security forces. The lack of tangible improvement in basic services and allegations of corruption have further hurt his chances.
Al-Maliki's coalition is facing a tough challenge from a rival Shiite bloc, the religiously oriented Iraqi National Alliance. The main partners in this bloc are the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, or SIIC, and the Sadrists.
If the Iraqi National Alliance emerges as the largest bloc in the 325-seat parliament — and if the Sadrists win more seats than SIIC — that would likely place the fiery cleric in a strong position to pick the next prime minister.
SIIC officials are quietly acknowledging that the Sadrists are likely to emerge as the biggest winner in the bloc, thus robbing their own party of the chance to secure the prime minister's job.
They say Iran, which wields a great deal of influence within Iraq's Shiite establishment, is throwing its weight behind the Sadrists in the hope that they would do its bidding in a new government.
A top SIIC leader, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the topic, said the party would try to prevent the Sadrists from gaining control by securing the support of smaller groups within the coalition.
Officials at al-Maliki's Shiite-led "State of Law" coalition also have acknowledged the Sadrists will fare well in the vote.
Salah al-Obeidi, al-Sadr's chief spokesman, told The Associated Press that party projections indicate the National Alliance would win 70 to 80 seats in the new legislature. Of these, he said, the Sadrists would have at least 35 seats.
While the forecast by the Sadrists could prove to be optimistic — there are no reliable polls — the movement has rebounded over the past year.
Al-Sadr's own political fortunes have been cyclical since he emerged as a power broker at the height of Iraq's violence. He maintained a low profile after leaving for Iran in 2007 as the U.S. began its buildup of troops, who cracked down on his militia and Sunni insurgents. But he recently has appeared to be positioning himself as a politician, replacing his militia with a grass-roots social welfare network.
His movement made a respectable showing in last year's provincial elections and has seen support grow in Baghdad and across the southern Shiite heartland. Much of its rise is tied to its social, health and education services and tireless calls for the withdrawal of the Americans, a stand that resonates with mostly poor Shiites who see the U.S. presence as the root of the country's problems.
A Sadrist prime minister, or one under the movement's influence, would likely call for a faster withdrawal of U.S. forces, who are currently scheduled to be gone by the end of next year.
A Sadrist-led administration also could jeopardize progress toward national reconciliation after years of killings and kidnappings, mostly at the hands of al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia — which battled U.S. troops for years in Baghdad's Shiite slums and in cities across the south.
It also would deal a blow to the U.S. aim of creating a model Western-style democracy in the region, as the Sadrists would likely favor a strict interpretation of Islamic teachings. Al-Sadr himself believes in the right to rule by the most learned cleric, the concept that underpins the rule of the clergy in neighboring Iran.
You Stink, America.
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
It says everything you need to know about the Music Industry that Lady Gaga is a Platinum Selling Sex Symbol, while this talented Blonde who is attractive enough that she doesn't need to hide her face behind a dozen layers of Make-Up is unknown outside North Carolina.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
"As of the census of 2007, the racial makeup of Tracy was 22.8% White, 17.1% African American, 2.2% Native American, 9.6% Asian, 15.7% Pacific Islander, 18.3% from other races, with 5.7% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 36.9% of the population." -Wikipedia
Hey Immigrant Coddling Jews,
As Immigration creates more and more Tracys, how do you think America is going to afford the American Military Presence in the Middle East that is essential to Israel's security?
Or is it that you hate Whites even more than you love your precious little cousins in Palestine?
Well, what's the most economical explanation for a people repeatedly seeking to ruin the very Country they rely on for racial survival? Obviously, it's that their desire to genocide Whites is stronger than their desire to continue living.
Monday, February 22, 2010
I've been having a back and forth on the subject of Ethnic Nepotism and EGI with former American Renaissance writer and webmaster Ian Jobling on his website. In this back and forth I've given my theory of how Ethnic Nepotism evolved.
The first part of this back and forth can be found here.
This is the second part, which consists of Jobling's effort to refute my Jepthath analogy, and my exposure of his supposed refutation as theoretically unsound:
"Reginald’s argument for ENT, which duplicates Rushton’s logic, is a potent one and should not be lightly dismissed. In fact, it deserves a separate article or blog post. But here’s the short answer. I’ll grant you that Jephthah’s sacrifice increases his fitness because of his relatedness to other Jews. But in the scenario you describe, who makes out best? All the Jews that don’t sacrifice their daughters! They get all the inclusive fitness benefits from Jephthah’s sacrifice that Jehpthah himself does, but they additionally get to keep their daughters, so they don’t pay the fitness cost that Jephthah does. Consequently, sacrificing your own life or that of your family may increase your fitness, but it is never the optimal strategy. Human beings are undoubtedly descended from people who did not make the kind of sacrifices that Jephthah did." -Ian Jobling
On the level of competition between Genes, you are correct and that is an excellent point.
However, on the level of competition between strategies, the situation is very different.
Let’s say there are two strategies, the Jephthah Strategy and the Selfish Strategy. Of what benefit is it to the Selfish Strategy if a Tribe with a member following the Jephthah Strategy defeats a Tribe without any members following the Jephthah Strategy?
From the Standpoint of the Selfish Strategy, all the benefits Israeli followers of the Selfish Strategy got out of Jephthah’s victory were made up for by the harm done to Ammonite followers of the Selfish Strategy.
In contrast, the Jephthah Strategy benefited from the victory, because Genes that weren’t related to an example of the Jephthah Strategy were replaced by the Genes that were related to an example of the Jephthah Strategy.
Thus the Genotype of the average Human in the area was pushed at least a little towards the Jephthah Strategy, and at least a little further away from the Selfish Strategy.
Now, of course, in most cases out and out sacrifice is stupid from an evolutionary perspective because there’s usually no benefit from it, due to the fact that after you’re dead there isn’t anything you can do to help your Family and/or Tribe. (This may be changing in recent times because of the phenomenon of Muslim Suicide Bombing.)
However, there have been many cases in History people have been able to help their Ethnic Kin by risking their life and/or the lives of their family members.
It is this behavior that has been selected for.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Golden Dawn's website is found here:
Information on how to donate to Golden Dawn can be found here:
Golden Dawn NYC's website is found here:
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Anyone should be able to not have their mouth sewn shut, to not have the hands they use to type smashed by a hammer. The systematic attack on the Lawrence Auster's View From the Right website, The use of violence to get it shut down, is an outrage. Therefore, even though I have had no association with Lawrence Auster since 1996, my instinctive reaction was to express concern over the cancellation of his website, which threatens the basic freedoms of all of us. But last night something was brought to my attention which reminded me why I had dissociated myself from Lawrence Auster in the first place.
Last night I sent this to several people:
"On February 16, Lawrence Auster appeared on Derek Jew's radio program to talk the problems with his conference (Auster comes on at around 35 minutes into the show). Don Jew, the founder of the website Jewfront, substituted for his son.
Jew's a Trotskyite type, right? He's a supporter of the exterminationist anti-Palestinian Meir Kahane. And Auster is pals with him.
And I'm expressing solidarity with Auster over his ability to communicate being canceled? "
One of my correspondents, Mike Berman, replied:
That's what I've been saying all along. Let the Kahanes and the Jews worry about Mr. Auster's rights. Here's what I wrote to ___ and ___ last night:
"What am I to think? How am I supposed to agree with what the White Vigilante League did to someone who killed and planned to kill more Whites and then worry about freedom of speech for those who would do it too if they could? Yeah, some of Mr. Auster's friends are Whites, but some of his best friends are Trotskyite Mass Murdering Swine as well. His big mistake was allowing Kahane into his world. "
Mr. Auster thought it was great that "50% percent of website attendees are Whites and 50% percent Stern Gang Terrorists." Well, it seems to have backfired on him in the end.
- End of initial entry --
Derek C. writes:
I think it was H.L. Mencken who put it best: "The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all. "
Michael Hart writes:
I must emphatically disagree with the view expressed by Michael Berman. If the rights of Lawrence Auster (and those of his supporters whom we detest) to freedom of speech are not protected, neither will ours be.
At a practical matter, we have little to fear from the Donald Jew or his ilk. We have much to fear from those who would shut down Lawrence Auster, and Arthur Jensen, and Geert Wilders (and you and me) if they could.
I detest such people as Meir Kahane and Danny Kaye. But I consider it both unprincipled and short-sighted not to defend their right to freedom of speech.
Of course Auster and anyone should be able to host a website - a perfectly legal activity, as Auster pointed out in the interview - without interference and without violence making it impossible to write the content.
So: I support Lawrence Auster's right to speak with like-minded people on a website. The individuals and groups who used violence to stop his website should be apprehended and prosecuted. The web hosting companies which agreed to host the website and then canceled it should be condemned. Media, especially conservative media, which ignore these jackboot tactics from the left should be criticized.
But beyond that, I don't want to express any solidarity with Auster. While he himself is not a Trotskyite or an anti-Gentile, it is his willing association with Trotskyites and serious anti-Gentiles, rather than the use of police state tactics to silence someone who agrees with me on every issue, that makes me sick.
Because according to me, merely the guilt of associating with anyone who is overly critical of White Gentiles puts you beyond the pale and unworthy of solidarity even after you've been subjected to Totalitarian Tactics.
As that wise poem put it:
First they came for the people who associate with Anti-Gentiles, and I did not speak out-because I am a Gentile Supremacist and like it whenever someone associated with Anti-Gentiles suffers.
Then I hit some Nightclubs, and had an awesome time.
Mike Berman writes:
There was a time when I used to participate in the View From the Right forum. The general consensus there was to let Whites participate. But after their dreamed of victory ... you know .. wink, wink. I'll not be a useful idiot.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
This very important and historically incisive analysis, left by commenter Whites Unite on a website, was made in response to the claim that Jews played no special role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Government:
Ethnic Jews were very overrepresented at the highest levels of the original Bolshevik leadership.
Consider the following list of the most important leaders, vital to the success of the Bolshevik takeover. This list includes Lenin himself and Bolshevik leaders mentioned by name in Lenin’s “Testament”:
Lenin - Leader of Bolsheviks
Trotsky - Creator of Red Army
Stalin - Organizer of the Soviet bureacracy
Kamenev - Party boss in Moscow
Zinoviev - Party Boss in Leningrad, leader of Comintern
Bukharin - Editor in chief of Bolshevik newspaper
Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev were ethnically Jewish. Stalin was Georgian, Bukharin Russian, and Lenin was of mixed Russian, Jewish, Tartar and German ethnic background. Even if you ignore Lenin’s part-Jewish ethnic background, you are still confronted with a 50% Jewish composition of the top leadership of an empire with less than 4% Jewish population.
The situation is even worse when you consider the left/right divide within the ranks of the top leadership after Lenin’s death. The Bolshevik left, led by Trotsky, wanted a foreign policy based on “exporting revolution”, which risked involving the Soviet Union in the miseries of a foreign war, and a domestic policy of collectivization/de-kulakization, certain to cause mass-misery in the countryside. (A program more antithetical to the slogan “Land, peace, bread” is difficult to imagine.) Kamenev and Zinoviev adhered to the left position. The Bolshevik right, led by Bukharin, advocated a foreign policy based on “socialism in one country” and a domestic policy based on the continuation of the NEP. In essence, the right policy was designed to give rural Russians and Ukrainians a reprieve from the miseries inflicted upon them during the civil war.
Stalin adopted a centrist position which enabled him to play the right and left factions off against each other, and thus consolidate his own power. Once this was acheived, Stalin proceeded to implement the domestic policy advocated by Trotsky and the foreign policy advocated by Bukharin. Of Lenin’s 5 most important successors, therefore, all three Jews supported the cruel left position, the Russian supported the humane right position and the non-Russian/non-Jew supported a position between these two extremes.
In case you consider inclusion in Lenin’s testament to be too restrictive a definition of “early Bolshevik leaders”, lets consider other figures who were absolutely essential to the Bolshevik seizure of power:
Alexander Helphand, aka “Parvus” - arranged German funding and right of way through German territory for Bolsheviks
Dhrzinsky - First leader of the Cheka
Tukhachevsky - Although not a Bolshevik, this collaborator’s military leadership was an important contributor to Bolshevik success in the civil war
Litvinov - His brilliant but devious diplomacy gained diplomatic recognition for the Soviet Union and staved off the threat of renewed foreign intervention.
Helphand and Litvinov were Jews, Dhrzinsky was a Pole, and Tukhachevsky a Russian.
Thus, a top ten list of the most important contributors to Bolshevik success is 50% Jewish, including the leading advocate of the atrocious collectivization/dekulackization - Trotsky. The two indisputable Russians on the list are Bukharin, the most humane of the major Bolsheviks, and Tukhachevsky, a reluctant collaborator.
For a consideration of Jewish overrepresentation in the middle and lower ranks of Bolshevik/CPSU leadership during the bloodiest years of European Communism - the Russian Civil War and collectivization - I recommend volume 2 of Solzhenitsyn’s “Two Hundred Years Together”. If you are unable to read Russian or French, unfortunately the only two languages in which this book is currently available, please see the serialized summary in “The Occidental Quarterly”.
To understand the magnitude of the horrors perpetrated 1918-1934, see Robert Conquest’s “Harvest of Sorrow” and the pertinant sections of “The Black Book of Communism”
Please note, Kevin MacDonald does NOT use the early Marxists or the Bolsheviks as examples of secular Jewish movements, because:
1. Marx and Trotsky vehemently rejected their Jewish roots.
2. Marx and Trotsky do not explicitly state that their movements advanced Jewish interests.
3. The early Marxists and the Bolsheviks were obviously not overwhelmingly Jewish in membership, and non-Jews such as Engels, Lenin, Stalin etc. had real influence, as opposed to marginalized figurehead/window dressing status.
There is a chapter in “Culture of Critique”, however, in which MacDonald features Leninist groups which DO fulfill his criteria of “Jewish Movements”: the post WW2 communist regimes in Poland and Hungary, and the CPUSA. If your prejudice against MacDonald is so great that you refuse to read the pertinant sections of “CofC”, at least read the books which he references - many written by Jews or other writers who are definitely not anti-semetic - to support his contention that in 1950 the Communist Parties of Poland, Hungary and the USA were overwhelmingly Jewish in composition, in which all the most important leadership positions were held by Jews proud of their ethnic heritage and self-consciously intent on promoting Jewish ethnic interests.
The crimes perpetrated by communists in Eastern Europe from 1918-1953 were colossal and horrendous. The Black Book of Communism estimates 20 million people were murdered by communists in the Soviet Union 1918-1953 and a further 1 million were murdered by communists in other Eastern European countries after WW2. That is an average of more than 1600 Eastern Europeans murdered per day, every day for 35 years! To put that into perspective, 1600 is more than the total number of Jews executed by the Czarist government or killed in pogroms during the entire period 1795-1916!
Yosemite, I do not know who you are or what your motives are, whether you are an honest man who argues in good faith or a sabotuer intent on creating division and confusion. Either way, if you have any consideration for historical truth, I implore you in the name of the 21 million - open your mind and take a fresh look at the evidence. Do not join with those who would prevent all possibility of a discussion, by politely ignoring/censoring/misrepresenting/nit-picking Solzhenitsyn and damning every other writer who addresses this topic as a mentally deranged hate filled anti-semite. Only by boldly confronting the unvarnished truth can white gentiles and Jews hope to live in true harmony.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Saturday, February 13, 2010
This is a blow to the cause of Human Biodiversity, and a victory for the diversity destroying horror that is Multiculturism:
"The last member of a unique tribe has died on India’s Andaman Islands.
Boa Sr, who died last week aged around 85, was the last speaker of ‘Bo’, one of the ten Great Andamanese languages. The Bo are thought to have lived in the Andaman Islands for as much as 65,000 years, making them the descendants of one of the oldest human cultures on Earth.
Boa Sr survived the Asian tsunami of December 2004, and told linguists, ‘We were all there when the earthquake came. The eldest told us ‘the Earth would part, don’t run away or move’. The elders told us, that’s how we know.’
Linguist Prof. Anvita Abbi, who knew Boa Sr for many years, said, ‘Since she was the only speaker of [Bo] she was very lonely as she had no one to converse with… Boa Sr. had a very good sense of humour and her smile and full throated laughter were infectious.’
‘You cannot imagine the pain and anguish that I spend each day in being a mute witness to the loss of a remarkable culture and unique language.’
Boa Sr told Abbi she felt the neighbouring Jarawa tribe, who have not been decimated, were lucky to live in their forest away from the settlers who now occupy much of the Islands." -Survival International
Perhaps *Prime Directive* Years from now, an 85 year old White Woman will sing an ancient song into a Microphone, exhale her last, and it will all be over.
Then the one whose breathing extended the lifetime of a continental race will close the door of heaven, locking it behind her.
Friday, February 12, 2010
A reader asked me for my thoughts on Ray Kurzweil and his Singularity prediction. What follows is his question and my response to him.
Off topic, but since you work in software and are knowledgeable on science I wanted to ask you. What do you think of the Singularity? Is it legit? Is it happening? Anytime soon? How about Kurzweil. Is he legit? Or just yet another messianic Jew selling his utopian vision to us cattle? -Anonymous
That's an excellent question.
I do not think Kurzweil's predictions to be legitimate, and I find his fanatical confidence in an untested hypothesis to be the hallmark of an unscientific mind.
His entire system of thought is built on an inference drawn from Moore's Law that fails to take into account that the rate of increase in computer processing speeds will be of limited utility beyond a certain point, because of the law of diminishing returns.
The thing is that we can currently simulate, with Koza's Genetic Programming technique, what would be designed by an AI with nearly infinite efficentizing powers.
And yet the best Human Designers have had their designs barely improved on by this technique!
The Human designer and the Genetic Program have access to the same technologic helpers and are judged by the same success metrics, making the comparison fair, and yet even Genetic Programs that come awfully close to simulating a complete search of the solution space offer us nothing that can be described as groundbreaking.
Even Meta-Genetic Programming has failed to produce anything of note but a few hundred patents based on incrementally useful modifications of previously existent systems.
This strongly suggests that in many important fields of technology, the smartest Humans are already bumping against the limits of what can be done with the physical materials presently available.
Therefore the whole idea that AI will open floodgates of technology far beyond the capacity of Humans to invent is a complete fantasy with no basis in empirical reality.
Another problem with Kurzweil is that there are serious reasons to think that Moore’s Law will start to run against physical obstacles, and that there could be decades of stagnation in the field as we await the possible salvation of quantum programming.
Finally, after some early promise, even Genetic Screening has started to face obstacles. Much less the field of Genetic Engineering, where the rate of advancement has actually decelerated.
“Or just yet another messianic Jew selling his utopian vision to us cattle?”
He reminds me a lot of Betty Friedan.
Friedan played on the dissatisfaction women felt with their actual lives, which at least had the virtue of being real, to sell them on a vision of Female “Liberation” from the role Evolution assigned to them.
In the same way Kurzweil plays on the dissatisfaction post-moderns feel with their actual lives, which at least have the virtue of being real, to sell them on a vision of “Liberation” from the Biological Existence allotted to Mankind as his inheritance and lot.
Both these visions are morally repugnant, and seem designed with no other purpose in mind but to use the Egotism of Whites to distract them from racially useful things like Family, Tradition, and Community.
It is notable that both Friedan and Kurzweil have concentrated on spreading their messages to the Gentiles Masses, showing that they don’t view their respective philosophies as possessing enough value for Jews to keep to themselves.
The contrast to how Jews have fiercely kept their philosophy of Ethnonationalism to themselves is highly instructive.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
The following passage is from the second chapter of Rodney Stark's remarkable work "For the Glory of God".
I reproduce it here because it is the finest and most exact definition of Science I have thus far encountered, and because of its relevance to a question I've been giving thought to lately:
"Science is not merely technology. A society does not have science simply because it can build sailing ships, smelt iron, or eat off porcelain dishes. Science is a method utilized in organized efforts to formulate explanations of nature, always subject to modifications and corrections through systemic observations.
Put another way, science consists of two components: theory and research. Theorizing is the explanatory part of science. Scientific theories are abstract statements about why and how some portion of nature (including human social life) fits together and works. However, not all abstract statements, not even all of those offering explanations, quality as scientific theories; otherwise, theology would be a science. Rather, abstract statements are scientific only if it is possible to deduce from them some definite predictions and prohibitions about what will be observed. And that's where research comes in. It consists of making those observations that are relevant to the empirical predictions and prohibitions. Clearly, then, science is limited to statements about natural and material reality - about things that are at least in principle observable. Hence there are entire realms of discourse that science is unable to address, including such matters as the existence of God.
Consistent with the views of most contemporary historians as well as philosophers of science, this definition of science excludes all efforts through most of human history to explain and control the material world, even those not involving supernatural means. Most of these efforts can be excluded from the category of science because until recent times 'technological progress - sometimes considerable - was mere empiricism,' as Marc Bloch put it. That is, progress was the product of observation and of trial and error, but was lacking in explanations - in theorizing. This objection even applies to Nicolaus Copernicus, since his heliocentric conception of the solar system was merely a descriptive claim (almost all of it wrong). He had nothing to say about why planets remain in their orbit around the sun, or moons about the planets. Until Newton there was no scientific theory of the solar system."
It is very important to understand that to have Science, you need both observation of something (such as a correlation) and an Explanation of how it happens.
This why Neurobiolgy is NOT Science, as in its current form it merely involves observing the correlation between a certain chemical in the Brain and the person with that Brain feeling a certain emotion, without explaining the mechanism causing that correlation to exist.
If I pick up a Ball with my hand, Friction is the explanation for the correlation between the movement of my hand and the movement of the Ball.
But where is the explanation for the correlation between Endorphins and Pleasure? Why should any special relationship between that Chemical and that Emotion exist, as opposed to that Chemical being correlated to some other Emotion or no Emotion at all?
Neurobiology has no explanation whatsoever at this point in time, and thus is in no way a form of Science, rather being a mere form of observation.
As I said to Cornelius Troost on OneSTDV's Blog:
What basis do you have for calling the "pleasure center" of the brain the "pleasure center" of the brain?
All you have is an ex post facto explanation that isn't based on anything resembling objective observation of reality, instead only being based on the results of asking subjective beings what this or that "feels like".
You don't even know what the phrase "feels like" actually means, on a scientific level, and yet you use that inane question as your basis for understanding the brain.
I could write a Computer Program where when a particular part of a Computer Chip was stimulated, it would report "feeling happy".
If you studied that Computer Program, you would have just as much reason for calling that part of the computer chip the "pleasure center" of the chip as you do for calling a part of the Human Brain the "pleasure center" of the brain.
In other words, your technique used to assign that name to a part of the Human Brain is complete garbage, and doesn't constitute real Scientific Evidence of anything.
If a Scientist knew nothing of "feelings", he would never guess based on observation of the brain that Qualia would be experienced by the people with those brains.
From a Scientific standpoint, the brain just looks like a mechanism designed by evolution to seek certain things and avoid other things, without there being the slightest need for Qualia.
What difference is there on a materialist level between a Human Brain, which according to you "feels" Qualia, and a Computer that doesn't feel anything at all?
And if the men who designed Computers felt no need to put Qualia in, why did Evolution go through the trouble of putting Qualia into us?
Now I could imagine Evolution leading to Beings that talk AS IF they felt Qualia, as that could be useful from the standpoint of communicating information about the impact of this or that on survival prospects.
However, no need for actual Qualia would ever arise.
The only real basis I have for saying Cornelius Troost feels Qualia, as opposed to being a Primate that evolved the ability to speak as it he feels Qualia, is that I am a member of the same Species as him and I know from my own subjective experience that I feel Qualia.
But beyond that subjective and highly personal information I am privvy to, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Troost or any other being in the Universe goes through Qualia or has actual feelings.
And in fact, Materialist Evoltuionary theory pushes us STRONGLY in the direction of the conclusion that no such thing as authenthic qualia exists.
The only problem is that this contradicts what we all know to be true: That we experience actual Qualia as we go through our lives.
You can read Mr. Troost's reply to this here. Though I must warn you that he failed to address my very important point about Evolution.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
I wonder why this song feels so life affirming to me, when it expresses an overwhelming sense of loss.
It must be the expansive spirit of Jenny Lewis, and the wonder of someone who can see so much and then say it in so few words.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
And that includes every Penny, every Nickle, every Dime, every Quarter, every Dollar, all money held in Bank Accounts, each Car, each Train, each Airplane, every Oil Well, every Work of Art, each Television Set, every DVD, every DVD Player, every VHS Tape, every Library, every Book in every Library, every Building owned by the Government, every Building not owned by the Government, every article of clothing, every Cow, every Horse, every Goat, every Square Foot of Land, every Copyright to every work of Art held by a person or legal entity based on American Territory, every Birth Control Pill, every Computer, every copy of every Software Program, etc.
"As you read this, the U.S. national debt is approximately 12 trillion dollars, although it is going up so rapidly that it is really hard to pin down an exact figure... The total value of all physical assets in the United States, both publicly and privately owned, is somewhere in the neighborhood of 45 to 50 trillion dollars." -Economic Collapse Blog
Still want to hold on to those US Treasury Bonds, China and Japan?
Well, I'm sure with the constant threat of Terrorism, the soon to come retirement of the mostly White Baby Boomers and their replacement by economically retarded Mexicans, and all the Social Security and Medicaid these newly unproductive Baby Boomers are going to suck out of the system every year going forward, that things will work out Okay for the USA!
Thank God the White Ethnostate won't be continuous enough with the United States to bear any responsibility for its debt.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
“Students are eligible to be considered for a GMS scholarship if they: Are African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian and Pacific Islander American, or Hispanic American.” -Gates FoundationIt's almost like there's something missing from that list, but I just can't put my finger on it.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Steve Sailer, I kid you not, Obama just said we need to support Israel because it is "Vibrant".
This is really weird to me because I always thought the word Vibrant was a codeword for Diverse and Anti-Racist, and yet Israel has an explicitly racial immigration policy that is designed with no other purpose but to stop the Country from becoming diverse!
As always, one standard for the Jew and another for the White Man.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
It is very important to understand that Osama Bin Laden is playing a game of chess.
In this game he seeks to Checkmate the King (Israel), but can't because the square he could checkmate from is defended by a Knight (America) placed behind the King.
Thus before he can achieve his goal, he must have two things:
1. A Piece of his own (Terrorism) to capture or pin the Knight defending the key square.
2. Another Piece to Checkmate the King from the key square once its defender is neutralized.
As you can see, there's no reason for him to go in for the kill against the Knight, until such time as he can count on a piece to take advantage of the opening created by the Knight being removed from the field of relevant action.
That piece Bin Laden will be able to count on is a Nuclear Iran.
Once Iran gets the Bomb, I tend toward the view that history will start getting interesting again, perhaps more like it was before Neo-Liberalism locked 99.9% of the movers and shakers in a mental straightjacket.
And notably, there's a sign from Bin Laden's very recent message that Al Qaeda is in a mindframe of concentrating mental and poetic energies on Anti-Zionist goals. This sign is that Bin Laden, with an economy and power of expression that made the rest of the tape seem perfunctory, said:
"America will not dream of security until we live it as a reality in Palestine."
Monday, February 1, 2010
I have a very important article in The Occidental Observer Blog entitled:
"Legalized Pornography and Demographic Genocide"
I recommend you read it carefully, and also try to find the time to go through the comments (or at least the ones by Adam and my replies to him).
On this topic, Iceland is one of only two White Countries where Pornography is banned, and its Total Fertility Rate just went up 3.5% to 2.14.
This is easily the highest Fertility Rate of any White Country in the World, and is all the more remarkable considering that Iceland has no Non-White Immigrants to artificially drive up its birthrate.