Monday, May 31, 2010

Smashing The Millstone Dragging The World To Destruction

Nina Kouprianova, a very intelligent Russian woman, is really feeling her oats in her latest column for Alternative Right:

The Cassandra of Moscow

A new Orthodox-Catholic model of global development will replace the last 600 years of colonial liberalism -- in the long-term. In the short-term, the U.S. is still about to collapse. This is not another conspiracy theory from the blogging depths of the internet, but the newest interview with Igor Panarin in a recent issue of Economic Strategies (Ekonomicheskie Strategii 4 (2010)).

Igor Nikolaevich is a political scientist, an academician at the Russian Military Academy, and a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He holds PhDs in psychology and political science. Panarin has made a career of long-term geopolitical commentary, much of which has been far less rosy than that by a standard talking head on a major news network.

In the interview with Economic Strategies, Panarin suggests that what we are seeing today is the crash of a 600-year cycle of global development. This cycle is based on two major components -- the drug trade and the slave trade -- the foundation of all European colonial empires, especially the British Empire. However, the collapse of the Soviet Union marked the near-exhaustion of this particular geopolitical model:

"Let me remind you that since 2006, the Fed has not been providing any information about the number of dollars it prints, even at the request of the Congress. Consequently, ideologically [Americans] are not able to create a new model. Colonial liberalism, which dominated the past 500-600 years, is at the end of its journey. Marxist socialism-colonialism was a part of this colonial liberalism, developed during the information war waged by the British Empire. Marxism, in fact, was an imported project, used to suppress Russia, Germany, and other alternative financial and economic systems. Protestants were the shock force in the construction of colonial liberalism. Whether they liked it or not, the spiritual and economic components were precisely Protestant-Lutheran.

As the U.S.-dollar model of liberal colonialism ceases to exist, Igor Nikolaevich projects that it will be replaced by three key currencies: the rouble, the Euro, and the Asian Monetary Unit (ACU) -- based on the Chinese yuan. When it comes to North America, in particular, the Canadian dollar may become the source of a new regional currency, because the U.S. dollar is likely to disappear as a result of the U.S. collapse. He reminds us that the Canadian dollar is supported by natural resources, and can, therefore, gain strength. However, if the U.S. smartens up and reinstitutes something like the silver dollar, then it might be possible to create a new regional currency on the Can-American basis. This currency would allow for a relatively painless way out of the economic crisis, 'Those people, who have been an influence on the geopolitical and economic situation, of course, do not want to lose power. They fear, say, physical elimination.'"

Panarin believes that there is reason to forecast the collapse of the U.S. as early as July, which would be led by California. The collapse of California would trigger a default, which would have a fatal impact on the U.S. economy.

It's very important to understand that we currently have a power structure where China is a far better friend to people of European descent than America is. This is because China and Europeans both have an interest in the weakening of America as an Economic Power and her destruction as a Military Power, while the American Elite seek to stop these healthy developments from coming to fruition.

The way you destroy America is by replacing the Dollar as the Global Reserve Currency. The value of the Dollar is being propped up by Foreign Governments, especially in Asia, and the debt becomes unservicable the second enough dollars are displaced from their places in Sovereign Asset Funds.

And if a lot of this replacing can be done by the Ruble, strengthening the influence of the racially conservative Russian Government, so much the better.

There has been untenable harm done to Europe by the World War II derived calamity of their being dominated by an American Elite, and few things could be better for the indigenous inhabitants of Europe than the overthrow and/or replacement of this Elite's influence by the Russians.

Every time a faction of Europeans have wanted to do something idiotic or ruinous the Americans have backed that faction, putting them over the top to seeing their evil plans put into practice.

Then as Russia has done positive things they’ve had the American Government and its Puppet-Masters like George Soros constantly attack them from the Left.

Also I tend to think the armies of Western Europe are extremely weak, for the most part.  Even the Countries in Southwestern Europe that still have masculinity and fighting spirit tend to spend very little on keeping their weapons systems properly updated, due to the profoundly regretable mistake they made of relying on the America dominated EU security umbrella.

And it would be far better, for example, to have Russian troops in Germany than American troops partly for this reason.

With the Russian soldiers you know two things:

1. Unlike the Western European soldiers, it is certain they would easily win against Non-Europeans.

2. Unlike American soldiers, they would actually fight against the Non-Europeans, and not for them.

7 comments:

British Patriot,  May 30, 2010 at 11:06 PM  

...Marxist socialism-colonialism was a part of this colonial liberalism, developed during the information war waged by the British Empire. Marxism, in fact, was an imported project, used to suppress Russia, Germany, and other alternative financial and economic systems. Protestants were the shock force in the construction of colonial liberalism. Whether they liked it or not, the spiritual and economic components were precisely Protestant-Lutheran.

Reginald,

Your really going to like this book:

“THE NAMELESS WAR”
- Captain A.H.M. Ramsay, Royal Navy; Member of Parliment


CHAPTER 1

THE BRITISH REVOLUTION

"It was fated that England should be the first of a series of Revolutions, which is not yet finished."

With these cryptic words Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Earl of Beaconsfield, commenced his two volume life of Charles I published in 1851. A work of astonishing detail and insight, much information for which, he states, was obtained from the records of one Melchior de Salom, French envoy in England during that period.

The scene opens with distant glimpses of the British Kingdom based upon Christianity, and its own ancient traditions; these sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and the people in one solemn bond on the one hand; on the other hand, the ominous rumblings of Calvinism.

Calvin, who came to Geneva from France, where his name was spelt Cauin, *possibly a French effort to spell Cohen, organized great numbers of revolutionary orators, not a few of whom were inflicted upon England and Scotland. Thus was laid the groundwork for revolution under a cloak of religious fervour.


[...]

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/nameless/1.shtml

Anonymous,  May 31, 2010 at 10:49 AM  

Panarin has been pushing his notion of collapse for some time. Another Russian doomsayer is Orlov.

http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/

I wonder when the USA will hyperinflate.

Some Asians claim the USA will be able to cut welfare to the bone and balance its budget without hyperinflating. I think it's more like that the Fed will print and the USA dollar will be like the Zimbabwe dollar before anyone at the Fed knows what's happening.

If the world oil markets start pricing oil in rubles and renmimbi - yeah, that's when the USA is over.

Ronduck,  June 3, 2010 at 12:44 AM  

Your living in a fantasy world if you think Spain still has martial spirit. The whole reason Spain has cut its military budget to the bone is because their government has been spending money on windmills and solar power. In fact, the Spanish state has been spending so much money on green energy that when it stopped spending such huge amounts of money the Chinese solar industry imploded from lack of Spanish orders.

SW Europe may have had fighting spunk as recently as the 1970's but it no longer does.

Second, I mentioned in another comment that the Mainline Protestants here in the US would go back to Rome and you thought that such a union wouldn't be likely. In the article you posted the author discusses a possible Orthodox-Catholic alliance, even though the Orthodox have hated the Roman Church for almost one thousand years. Essentially all of the non-Evangelicals are uniting under the banner of Rome.

I would definitely make love to the author of that article.

Statsaholic June 3, 2010 at 12:46 AM  

Ronduck,

Unless you’re talking about something that happened really recently that I missed, you are wrong about Spain.

This chart shows that far from disinvesting in military spending, Spain had a bigger increase in per capita military spending from 1998 to 2008 than any of the 15 selected Countries other than Canada:

http://filipspagnoli.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/defense-spending-per-capita.jpg

Also, I wasn’t really talking about Marital Spirit, but rather a Masculine Fighting Spirit on the level of individuals.

This sort of spirit doesn’t always translate into Military Effectiveness, certainly, but is a necessary precondition to such effectiveness.

“SW Europe may have had fighting spunk as recently as the 1970's but it no longer does.”

Even though sadly the Spanish have become more Liberal/Swipple-like than other Southern Europeans, with some evidence for this to be found in the idiots going against their heritage to sign petitions calling for the abolishion of Bull Fighting, they still have more fighting spirit than at least a lot of other Countries in Western Europe do.

I certainly can’t imagine a Spaniard of today crying himself to sleep because his Iranian captors made fun of him for looking like Mr. Bean! (or whatever the Spanish equivalent of Mr. Bean is…)

Much less could I imagine him admitting it to newspapers, like the English “Seaman” Arthur Batchelor did.

“Seaman Batchelor's claim that he cried himself to sleep after his Iranian captors likened him to the comedy character Mr Bean made him a laughing stock.”

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23392218-im-sorry-for-selling-my-story-says-iran-hostage-mr-bean.do

Ronduck June 3, 2010 at 1:30 AM  

You really like to quote figures out of context. If you go to this article at Wikipedia you can find what percentage of GDP every country in the world is spending on it military. Here are some national values to chew on:

Eritrea: 20.9%
Israel: 8.6%
United States: 4.0%
Greece: 3.3%
Poland: 2.0%
Portugal: 2.0%

Netherlands: 1.5%
Norway: 1.5%
Slovakia: 1.5%
Denmark: 1.3%
Germany: 1.3%
Spain: 1.2%

I mentioned Spain because they have been in the news in the last few years as engaging in masive cowardice, such as running away from their own commitments in Iraq. If the Spaniards had declined to join the coalition I couldn't call them cowards, but to back out over one Islamic attack is cowardice.

Most of Europe, except for Greece, spends less than 2% on defense. Greece shares a border with an Islamic power that it has fought repeatedly and as such must be more heavily armed.

Statsaholic June 3, 2010 at 1:33 AM  

"Second, I mentioned in another comment that the Mainline Protestants here in the US would go back to Rome and you thought that such a union wouldn't be likely. In the article you posted the author discusses a possible Orthodox-Catholic alliance, even though the Orthodox have hated the Roman Church for almost one thousand years.”

I don’t know if this alliance will get off the ground, or what form Nikolaevich thinks it would take.

The more general point he’s making is that the power structure largely built up by Protestants is in serious danger of collapse, and that the Russian Orthodox and Catholic Churches are going to be two of the biggest beneficiaries.

The Russian Orthodox because their close allies in the Russian Government will be profoundly empowered, and the Catholics because their missions in the Third World will face much less competition from Protestants.

It’s like what you explained to me on this Blog: The Catholic Church is against the existence of America because it is a bastion and well-spring of Protestantism, which they view as an obstacle to their self-important task of saving souls by making them Catholics.

Whether the common interest Russian Orthodox and the Catholic Church have in the destruction of America and the stamping out of what remains of the Anglo-American power structure after said destruction will translate into a meaningful alliance remains to be seen.

“Essentially all of the non-Evangelicals are uniting under the banner of Rome.”

In this case it might be more accurate to the say the Roman Church may find itself under the banner of the Russian Orthodox Church.

I found this fascinating article from February of 2010:

“It is impossible to be Catholic in Russia without respecting Russian Church – Archbishop Pezzi

Moscow, February 18, Interfax – Head of the Archdiocese of the Holy Virgin in Moscow Archbishop Paolo Pezzi urged faithful Catholics to respect the Russian Orthodox Church.

“It is obviously impossible to be Catholics in Russia without deepest respect to the Russian Orthodox Church, without sincerest and ardent wish to unite with her as she preserves substantial part of the richest spiritual tradition of this nation,” Pezzi said in his article for the Vita e pensiero Italian magazine published by the diocesan bulletin in Russian translation.

According to the Archbishop, ‘in spite of cultural differences, this tradition is enrooted in faith that almost corresponds to the Catholic faith in its basis.’

Pezzi urges to consider Catholic mission ‘not as parallel or competing with the mission of the Orthodox Church as if we were trying to convert more Russians to Catholicism, but as truly ‘ecumenical,’ penetrated with desire to carry out and demonstrate today (in forms God grants us) the unity we are to promote in full plenitude.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2454309/posts

Now that’s the right way to deal with the Catholic Church (at least the way it is today), in terms of not letting them Proselytize in your Country.

In any event, I hope the Catholic Church becomes more like the Russian Orthodox Church, especially as opposed to the opposite thing happening.

Statsaholic June 3, 2010 at 2:13 AM  

"You really like to quote figures out of context."

No I don't. I quoted those figures to show you were wrong to say Spain is cutting its Military Spending.

I was in no way addressing the issue of absolute Military Spending in Spain, only the idea that they went soft recently and this led them cutting Military Spending in favor of Green Energy.

To say they cut Military Spending just so they could get more Green Energy makes them sound far more Swipple than they actually are.

"If you go to this article at Wikipedia you can find what percentage of GDP every country in the world is spending on it military."

I already saw that list. As I said in the article, by placing themselves under the EU Security Umbrella, the Countries of Southwestern Europe have been led down the garden path of not spending enough on keeping their weapons systems updated.

Still, it is notable that Spain has the 5th largest Military Budget in the EU, while having the 5th largest GDP in the EU.

Overall Spain is spending about 38% as much on its Military as Russia is.

But really this whole question of relative Military Spending isn’t the real point. The fact that Russia is only spending a wee bit more on her Military than Germany hardly means anything.

The important thing is that the Russians have macho enough of a culture that I have almost no doubt the Russians would crush what years of American occupation and cultural imperialism has turned the Germans into.

"I mentioned Spain because they have been in the news in the last few years as engaging in masive cowardice, such as running away from their own commitments in Iraq."

The Spanish people were always dead-set against that War.

"The opposition to the war manifested itself most visibly in a series of global protests against the Iraq War during February 2003, just before the Iraq invasion starting on March 20, 2003.

"Poll results available from Gallup International, as well as local sources for most of Europe, West and East, showed that support for a war carried out 'unilaterally by America and its allies' did not rise above 11 percent in any country. Support for a war if mandated by the UN ranged from 13 percent (Spain) to 51 percent (Netherlands)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_Iraq_War#Early_opposition

"If the Spaniards had declined to join the coalition I couldn't call them cowards."

They did decline to join the coalition. It just is that their Government didn't listen (due to being overly influenced by America).

"but to back out over one Islamic attack is cowardice."

At first the Governing Party lied that the attack was done by the Basque Separatists they hated. This so completely disgusted everyone that they voted the Party out of office.

Naturally enough given at least 87% opposition to the War in Iraq in Spain, the opposition Party was against the Iraq War and their election led to Spanish withdrawal.

When only 13% of the people are in favor of something and their Government does it anyway, they aren’t going to give that Government much slack when it comes to lying to them.

"All is Number" -Pythagoras






  © Free Blogger Templates Blogger Theme by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP