Thursday, December 31, 2009
With everything but the Afterlife, The Ancients greatly underestimated how much there was out there.
There are far more Stars beyond the World’s Bourne, and far more particles beyond reach of our feeble sight, than they had ever imagined. Also, the laws of physics are far stranger than anything The Ancients came up with in their theories.
What are the chances that these Ancients at the same time greatly overestimated the Afterlife, thinking it exists when in fact it does not?
On this subject, in the 20th Century some Scientists started speculating on a form of Afterlife that would not necessarily require the intervention of a Supernatural Being:
"In addition, the philosophical concept of eternal recurrence was addressed by Arthur Schopenhauer. It is a purely physical concept, involving no "reincarnation", but the return of beings in the same bodies. Time is viewed as being not linear but cyclical. ...Physicists such as Stephen Hawking and J. Richard Gott have proposed models by which a/the universe could undergo time travel, provided the balance between mass and energy created the appropriate cosmological geometry. More philosophical concepts from physics, such as Hawking's 'arrow of time', for example, discuss cosmology as proceeding up to a certain point, whereafter it undergoes a time reversal." -WikipediaI wonder if they’re right, given the general pattern of our ancestors having underestimated just how much there is that’s out there, and how much there is within us.
And if true, this theory would have mindbending implications to the question of free will.
Also on this subject, it’s a very little known fact that some Scientists take the possibility of Near Death Experiences reflecting the authentic experience of consciousness leaving the body seriously enough that they are doing a study to test them:
"In an effort to get to the bottom of this mysterious phenomenon, scientists have designed a new experiment to examine near-death experiences in heart attack survivors. Launched by the University of Southampton, it will be the largest ever international study into near-death experiences, involving 1,500 heart attack patients. And how are they going to prove whether humans really do have souls that break away from their bodies as they die and shuffle off towards eternity? With a bit of DIY and some postcards, it would seem. Researchers are setting up shelves above patients' beds on which a number of pictures will be put that can only be seen from above the ground. Patients will then be asked to recall any memories from the time of their cardiac arrest. If they can describe the pictures on the shelves, the scientists will have some proof of whether or not these out-of-body experiences are real, or just illusionary dreams." -The GuardianThe Guardian article concludes with an incredibly obtuse statement that is so typical of the kind of thinking produced by a failure to understand the nature of Scientific Progress:
"And should science even be attempting to investigate this – shouldn't doctors be concentrating on how to save lives rather than researching what happens if they fail?"For one thing everyone in their right mind knows that pure research often will have a practical value the reseachers never anticipated.
And for another thing, there's such a thing as having enough time left over from your job that you have time to do other things.
This excellent comment on the James Cameron picture “Avatar” was left in the comments section of Steve Sailer’s Blog in response to someone who said they filled in the Census race question with “Human Race“:
"James Cameron would consider you a big racist. At least that's the message I got from watching Avatar. Near the end the big bad villain scowls at the blue alien-loving hero, growling "how does it feel to betray your race?" at him. He means the human race and for Cameron a concern for and an identification with the human race makes him an evil racist." -GlossyThis is interesting in that it suggests some Liberals are moving away from an ideology of what used to be called “Race Treason”, where they work to advance the interests of other races at the expense of their own, to a program of “Species Treason”, where they’ve decided to finally give up on Minorities and just try to wipe everyone out.
Thankfully for those of my Gene Combinations that I share with all Humans but not with any Animal Species, this program will fail utterly.
Where it fails is in that it completely neglects to consider that we haven’t even stopped Blacks from being Racist on the level of Continental Races. So how much less will we be able to stop them from being Racist on the level of the Human Race?
Dey ain’t gonna give up dey welfare payments for no blue weirdos, much lessum dey gonna let no ****** be selling out his race to no blue weirdos. You bestin not be thinkina Tommen us with those Smurf Faced F******, blackman, or dey be puttin a cap in yo’ azz.*
But while the gene combinations I share with Humans and not Chimps are safe from harm by fanatical Liberal Scumbags, it’s another story whatsoever for the precious gene combinations I only share with my fellow whites.
Even putting aside the negative effect this has on my genetic interests, this is gravely important because together with certain cultural complexes these gene combinations produced generations of White People who accomplished more in important fields like Science, the Arts, and Technology than all the other races combined.
If there are any white men reading this, I implore you to father as many white babies per year as you can possibly manage.
And if you can’t afford to pay for their care and feeding, just pawn them off on the State like Blacks and Hispanics do.
If it’s okay when they do it and nobody in polite company complains, it can‘t possibly be wrong when we do it.
After all, that would be Racial Discrimination, which according to Liberals is the ultimate evil.
*My apologies to any blacks reading this for making fun of how you talk.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
"According to a CNN sampling of voters, 87 percent of Jewish voters voted Democrat." -Israel News on the 2008 American ElectionHowever Legendary the Jewish Influence on US Electoral Politics may be, the Jewish Influence on the American Abortion Rate is even greater.
Or perhaps more accurately, we should say the Jewish Influence on Abortion is more effective at moving the relevant result in one consistent direction. (And this in spite of Jews being almost 90% Democratic in their Voting Habits.)
I say this because while the correlation between Percent Jewish in a State and the Percentage who voted for the Democrat in 2004 was only an R Squared of .40, the correlation between Percent Jewish in a State and the Abortion Rate comes to an R Squared of .58!
This is important because it shows that the Correlation between having more Jews and more Abortion isn't just a question of Jews living in more liberal States and more Liberal States having more Abortion.
Also, this finding of the Jew/Abortion link actually being stronger than the Jew/Liberal Politics Link means there must be a Jewish Influence on Abortion that is independent of the Jewish Influence on Politics, as is illustrated by this Flow Chart:
Another way of looking at this is to rank the States by Percent Jewish and then look at the Abortion Rate.
Eerily, I found doing this that the most Jewish State (New York) has the 3rd Highest Abortion Rate of 40 Abortions per 1,000 women of childbearing age; while the least Jewish State (South Dakota) has the lowest Abortion Rate with only 8 Abortions per a thousand women of childbearing age.
Looking at the State’s by Quintiles (the 5th Quintile is the top 20% of States by Percent Jewish, the 1st the bottom 20%, etc.), we find:
% Jewish / Average Abortion Rate
5th Quintile 36.5
4th Quintile 19.1
3rd Quintile 18.3
2nd Quintile 13.5
1st Quintile 11.3
This remarkable finding suggests both a strong correlation between Percent Jewish and the Abortion Rate, and that a Threshold Effect of some kind could be at work here.
You see, the gap between the 5th Quintile and the 4th Quintile is much greater than any of the other gaps between Quintiles, thus pointing us to the possibility that it’s especially harmful to have Jews in a State if they reach above a critical threshold.
This critical threshold would appear to be about 2.6% Jewish, as the gap between the really high Abortion States and the rest appears to be between Nevada’s 2.9% Jewish Fraction and Pennsylvania’s 2.3% Jewish Fraction.
Please note that Nevada, the 9th most Jewish of the States, has an Abortion Rate One and a Half Times Higher than any of the 42 States with smaller Jewish Fractions.
Note this study only addresses the impact of Jews on the rate of Abortion in America. It is quite possible that there are places with high Abortion Rates but few Jews.
This study isn’t saying that Jews are always the cause of a Country having a high Abortion Rate. However, it is saying that Jews are the cause of America having such a high Abortion Rate, and that if America had less Jews it would be in a much healthier condition when it comes to this crucial metric.
Jews have been shown by Social Research to be much more likely to support Abortion than any other American Racial Group. Moreover, they have become legendary for having a disproportionate impact on politics and culture.
For these reasons I decided to do a study to test whether having a larger percentage of Jews in a State correlates with it having a higher Abortion Rate.
First I got the Fraction of Jews by US State from this website:
From the Census I got the equivalent figures on the percentages Non-Hispanic White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian for all 50 States and the District of Columbia.
I got the Abortion Rate by State here:
Finally, I ran Pearson Correlations on the Abortion Rate of a State and its Racial Composition, and found:
Correlation with Abortion
Percent Jewish +0.764
Percent White -0.655
Percent Black +0.537
Percent Hispanic +0.317
Percent Asian +0.268
One thing that stands out here is that every race except Non-Hispanic Whites will make a State's abortion rate go up!
So if you want to live in a society that isn't marred by boatloads of abortion, probably the only way to get that would be to carve a White Ethnostate out of North America. (Are you listening, Sen. Sam Brownback, you Iraq War supporting traitor to anything that could meaningfully be called Pro-Life?)
Also, this is consistent with Whites having a greater ability to plan out for the future than other races do. It just makes sense that the higher IQ race would have a better handle on the connection between sex and pregnancy, and would care more about future heartaches when deciding whether to engage in risky sexual behaviors likely to result in unwanted pregnancy.
The other thing that stands out is, of course, the sheer strength of the positive correlation between Percentage Jewish and the Abortion Rate. A correlation that is remarkably high given that Jews only make up 2.1% of the American Population!
Clearly, it isn't Jews aborting Jewish babies that is driving this result, there simply aren't enough Jewish women for that to even be a possibility. Rather it must be that the Jews use their Political and Cultural power in a State to promote Abortion, trying their best to make it as legal and acceptable as possible.
Also it could be that they promote Sexual Hedonism, and then after people fall for the trap of thinking its the "Cool" way to behave they're left with unwanted pregnancies that end up terminated by abortion.
But here is the thing that is almost incomprehensible. Even though Blacks are widely known to have by far the highest Abortion Rate of any Group, and even though there are almost 5 Times as Many Blacks in America as there are Jews, the Percentage of Jews in a State has a stronger Correlation with the Abortion Rate than the Percentage of Blacks in the State does!
Let me give you a monent to let that sink in. (I think it's one of the most intense effects relative to cause size discovered in the History of Demographic Research.)
It is very hard to see how this result can be explained unless Jews have an almost occult like power over non-Jewish culture and behavior, a power they can more easily wield the greater their proportion of a State's population.
Monday, December 28, 2009
So says Lawrence Auster, and as is often his habit the Man is correct. But this raises the question of just what success would be to them?
I think the answer can be provided by this Paraphrase of The Melancholy Dane:
“O God, they could be bounded in a nutshell and count themselves kings of infinite space--were it not that they are too stupid to seed Airplane Cargo Holds with timed explosives."This may all seem very interesting.
And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?
The response came back from the abyss:
“no. it's about an auction. They are bidding on her.”I will conclude this post with some ancient Eskimo Poetry that I‘ve found moving since I was a child, and which was brought to my mind by the abyss metaphor I just used:
In the great Night
My Heart will go out
The Darkness Comes Rattling
In the great Night
My Heart Will go out.
Let’s say for the sake of argument that we live in a Platonic Sort of Universe where every Human Life has equal meaning and value of itself.
It should be clear to all that it would behoove us to ask the question: “Would some lives have more meaning and value even in such conditions?”
Let’s take the example of my Grandfather and the value of his life versus the value of the life of a Homosexual Classmate of his, and use it as a test case.
My grandfather has lived 1 Life, which is worth 1 Platonic Gold Coin of Meaning. The Homosexual Classmate has lived 1 Life, which is also worth 1 Platonic Gold Coin of Meaning. Doesn’t this make their lives equal in value?
The problem is that the above analysis takes an overly narrow generational view of things.
Sure, if we look at the Life Value of my Grandfather vs. the Life Value of the Homosexual Classmate, we find:
Personal Life Value 1 1
But take a look what happens when we include in our calculations the fact that the Homosexual had no children but my Grandfather has had 9 Children, 13 Grandchildren, and 2 Great-Grandchildren! (Note in the below it is assumed that a Father deserves half the credit for his children getting to be alive, a Grandparent one-fourth the credit, etc.)
Personal Life Value 1 1
Inclusive Life Value 8 0
Total Life Value 9 1
The life of my heterosexual Grandfather proved to be 9 Times as Valuable as the value of his Homosexual Classmate, even in a World where it is assumed that every Human Life Lived is of equal!
Egalitarianism is so clearly a lie given that it isn't even true given an assumption that all lives are of equal value.
It is also clear that Heterosexuals are more valuable to Humanity than Homosexuals are, and those responsible for organizing society should bear this in mind.
Sunday, December 27, 2009
It doesn’t matter very much what brand you use, it's just a question of getting a big enough dosage.
I found the Percentage of People for 41 Countries who called themselves "Very Religious" in a 2005 Values Survey by Gallup:
I then combined this in a Multiple Regression with data on their Total Fertility Rate, Per Capita Income, and whether they are White, Muslim, or Mongoloid (there weren‘t enough black countries in the sample to make including that as a dummy variable worth the trouble). And guess what I found? Well, for one thing I found that once you take into account Muslim Countries being more Religious, following Islam gave a Country no gain in TFR whatsoever!
Given all the differences between Islam and Christianity, this finding was very surprising to me, and it indicates that it's being Very Religious of itself that is beneficial to fertility.
And thus the statistical evidence pushes us to the conclusion that, from an evolutionary perspective at least, it doesn’t matter worth squat what Religion you lavish your devotion unto.
It just matters that you find one and lavish away.
Here's the results of the Multiple Regression:
Ind. Var. R Squared
I think that besides Religiosity appearing to be beneficial to fertility without regard to which religion it is, it's also extremely interesting that there appears to be almost no correlation between Income and TFR once you adjust for Religiosity and Race/Religion.
Just what Human Biodiversity Theory would predict, an increase in Federal Spending unprecedented in American History save for cataclysms like the Civil War and World War Two!
Here's the Year to Year change in Federal Spending as a % of GNP from 1960 to 2009:
Yep, the increase in % of GNP Spent by the Feds increased 2.57 Times more from ‘08 to ‘09 than in any other yearly change from 1960 to the present day!!
Also it’s 8.8 times greater than the average year to year change in Federal Spending for the 21 years since 1960 where spending went up.
Obama said we were voting for change, and he wasn't kidding!
Golden Dawn's website is found here:
Information on how to donate to Golden Dawn can be found here:
Golden Dawn New York's website is found here: